Thomas Hobbes: Was He an Atheist?

By Cox, Criseyda | History Review, December 1997 | Go to article overview

Thomas Hobbes: Was He an Atheist?


Cox, Criseyda, History Review


Seventeenth-century thought was God-ridden; the dawning Age of Reason was also an Age of Faith. Despite self-conscious claims to novelty, Rationalism was an intellectual revolution less in its assumptions and conclusions (which generally owed much to the past), than in Its method of enquiry which prioritised logic, mathematics and scientific experiment. The universe of' mind and matter was still God's creation, to be explained only as a rationally discernible design within a deist and Christian framework. Pegged on the conceptions of reason and nature, the Age saw nature as q conduit through which man (with limited reason) was able to perceive a suggestion of the superior reason of God the Creator. Those contemporaries of Hobbes, who `smashed the crystal spheres as if they had been windows' (Hollis) and discovered that the blood circulates, offered by definition a systematic catechism about the ways of God.

However, although the co-operation between faith and reason in a universe controlled by an omniscient, omnipotent and good God was axiomatic for St Thomas Aquinas, and a point of view which endured (albeit under growing strain) for three hundred years, it did not survive unimpaired into its fourth century. The Reformation dangerously disputed the mysteries of the Christian religion, the interpretation of the Bible and the canons of rational theology; whilst the medieval scientific world gradually collapsed, taking with it Man's geo-centric place in God's scheme, which was replaced by the humanism and individualism of the Renaissance. Doubt and deism were as old as Christianity itself. But it now faced a much greater struggle than that against heresy and schism which had characterised its last thousand-and-a-half years of existence. It confronted a new idea of man's place in the universe.

Despite this, the Rationalists attempted to rescue God's universe from doubt and dispute. But there were philosophical problems inherent in this too, and men (even when contemplating the same new universe) continued to differ fundamentally on its nature and implications. The Age was highly sophisticated, addressing issues such as the origin and nature of matter -- but also deeply primitive, reliant on the supernatural and signs, Providence, witches and spasms of national prayer and fasting. In any case, Redwood argues that it was the age of ridicule which did far more harm to Christian defences than did the onslaught of reason and nature.

Concurrent with these intellectual developments was the political theorising produced in England as a result of the period of breakdown and constitutional experiments of 1642-1660. Furthermore, there was the internal doctrinal wrangling within the Anglican Church (although under siege from Catholics, deists and radical dissenters) on such long-standing issues as the nature of the Trinity, the literalness of hell and miracles in the Bible, the authenticity of biblical sources and the role of the Church in society. The uncertainties created by these disputes and combined pressures, which were intensified by the post-Restoration degeneration in the state of the nation's morals and behaviour (especially since the more puritan of consciences foresaw the effects of God's wrath), helped to generate an almost paranoid fear of irreligion.

`Atheists were even rarer and more obscure in seventeenth-century England than communists in the modern United States' (Glover). Aylmer recognises three main types of `atheist' in the seventeenth century -- the `popular scoffer and blasphemer', the `rare but genuine philosophic doubter, unbeliever or materialist who even dared to convey his sentiments to others in however disguised a manner'; and `the silent sceptic or cynic, who doubted or disbelieved but kept quiet'. But, despite the almost total absence of those explicitly denying the existence of God, and the scarcity of avowed deists, a voluminous body of literature (which began in the 1580s following the religious conflicts of that century and was given momentum by the 1640s) existed to denounce, discuss and urgently chart society's surrender to these religious aberrations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Thomas Hobbes: Was He an Atheist?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.