Missing the Bus: Gerald Ford and School Desegregation

By McAndrews, Lawrence J. | Presidential Studies Quarterly, Fall 1997 | Go to article overview

Missing the Bus: Gerald Ford and School Desegregation


McAndrews, Lawrence J., Presidential Studies Quarterly


In 1957, as Little Rock, Arkansas began its court-ordered school desegregation, a Boston clergyman telephoned a Little Rock colleague to insure that the church was doing its part. In 1974, as Boston commenced its court-ordered school desegregation, the Little Rock priest called his old friend. He refused to take the call.(1)

Like the Boston priest, Representative Gerald Ford had supported the 1954 Brown v Board of Education decision which led to the Little Rock desegregation, but he had opposed the 1971 Swann v Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District verdict which cleared the way for the Boston desegregation. And when President Gerald Ford responded to violent resistance in Boston and elsewhere by speaking equivocally and acting reluctantly, advocates of busing to coerce desegregation accused him of refusing to answer the call of leadership which beckons a powerful individual to steer society on a proper, if unpopular, course.

As a politician, Ford knew that busing was not popular. As a conservative Republican, however, Ford believed that a substantial federal alternative to busing would not be proper. So he haltingly led the country on a search for a more palatable remedy for school segregation. In the years during and since his administration, however, neither he nor the country has ever really found one.

School Desegregation

In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v Board of Education that de jure segregation violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The next year, the Court ordered the dismantling of such segregation "with all deliberate speed," leaving implementation to lower court judges. On the tenth anniversary of the Brown decision, however, only I percent of African-American children in the South attended desegregated schools.(2)

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 moved to enforce the Brown decision. Title IV of the Act empowered the Justice Department to litigate school desegregation cases, while Title VI permitted the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare to withdraw federal monies from segregated schools. By 1968, the fraction of African-American children in desegregated southern schools had increased to 10 percent.(3)

In 1968 the Supreme Court ruled in Green v New Kent County that "freedom of choice" voluntary desegregation plans that did not produce significant racial mixing violated the Equal Protection Clause. For the next three years, on the important questions of "whether a school system must achieve a particular racial balance in order to satisfy constitutional standards and the extent to which a school board must reassign students to distant schools in order to overcome segregated residential patterns," the Court would remain silent.(4)

In a unanimous ruling in Swann v Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District in April 1971, the Supreme Court upheld the busing of students between white suburban and black inner-city schools to reverse the effects of pre-1954 de jure segregation within the district. (The average one-way trip lasted one hour and fourteen minutes, and exceeded fifteen miles.) In January 1972 in Richmond, Virginia, and in June in Detroit, federal judges ordered the busing of schoolchildren across school district lines to overcome residential segregation patterns.(5)

In March 1974, the House of Representatives, by a vote of 293 to 117, passed an anti-busing addition to H.R. 69, the Education Amendments of 1974. The amendment, sponsored by Michigan Republican Marvin Esch, "prohibited federal courts or agencies from ordering busing of students to any but the school closest or next closest to the student's home" and "provided that any school district under a federal court order or desegregation plan in effect on the date of H.R. 69 could ask that the case be reopened and made to comply with the provisions of Title II." The Senate passed H.R. 69 but rejected the Esch Amendment, 46-47.(6)

The conference report on the bill adopted the Senate amendment prohibiting busing "beyond the school next closest" to a student's home but allowing courts to mandate additional busing "if it were required to guarantee the student's civil rights. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Missing the Bus: Gerald Ford and School Desegregation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.