Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Does a Market Orientation Strategy Exist toward Business School Students? a View from Three Levels of Academic Administrators

By: Webster, Robert L.; Hammond, Kevin L. | Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, July 2008 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Does a Market Orientation Strategy Exist toward Business School Students? a View from Three Levels of Academic Administrators


Webster, Robert L., Hammond, Kevin L., Academy of Marketing Studies Journal


INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS

Successful organizations seek to attain and maintain high levels of performance; but can a particular organizational strategy or culture lead to improved organizational performance? If so, can such a strategy or culture be described and then be measured quantitatively? And, if measurements can be made will comparisons in measurements between organizations be advantageous in helping organizations improve their performance?

This paper investigates these questions, measures a specific component of organizational strategy and compares three managerial levels of educational organizations. The organizational strategy measured is market orientation. The quantitative measurement is accomplished by way of a scaled instrument used in a national survey. The comparisons described in this research include benchmarked levels between commercial businesses (for profit entities) and various organizational levels of schools of business administration (non-profit entities).

In marketing literature, numerous similar sounding terms are often encountered. These terms are not synonymous and should not be used interchangeably. To help differentiate and explain terms, the following three descriptions and definitions are provided:

 
   The marketing concept is a philosophy that advocates that a 
   successful organization begins with identifying customer needs and 
   wants, decides which needs to meet, and involves all employees in 
   the process of satisfying customers. 
 
   Marketing orientation implies that the marketing function is the 
   most important function within the organization and that all other 
   functional areas are driven by the demands of the marketing 
   department. 
 
   Market orientation refers to an organizational culture in which 
   everyone in the organization is committed to the customer and 
   adapts in a timely manner to meeting the changing needs of the 
   customer. Market orientation blends a company culture dedicated to 
   providing superior value with successfully achieving a customer 
   focus, acquiring competitor intelligence, and maintaining 
   interfunctional coordination. It is viewed as the implementation of 
   the marketing concept. 

DISCUSSION AND LITERATURE REVIEW

The Baldrige Education Criteria for Performance Excellence, developed by the Baldrige National Quality Program (BNQP 2005), rest on the assumption that universities can take steps to achieve "performance excellence". The document specifies certain marketing-related activities, and emphasizes the need to identify and plan strategies with respect to various segments of students, stakeholders and other markets. The Baldrige criteria are designed to be used for self-assessment, awarding Baldrige prizes, and providing feedback to educational institutions applying for them, but have other important purposes as well. They can be used by any university business school, for example, regardless of whether or not it is an award applicant, to "improve organizational performance practices, capabilities, and results," to "facilitate ... sharing of best practices," and to assist in "understanding and managing performance ... guiding organizational planning and opportunities for learning" (BNQP 2005).

Excellence of performance in higher education is self-evidently important. In the business discipline, it is assessed and assured by the qualification standards of the bodies awarding formal accreditation to business schools (Karathanos and Karathanos 1996). In the U.S.A., these are mainly AACSB International (the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business, known until 1997 as the American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business) and ACBSP (the Association of Collegiate Business Schools and Programs), address performance evaluation and improvement. Performance is ranked more informally in the U.S.A. by the annual guide published by U.S. News and World Report and by the Peterson's web-based educational information resource, both directed at prospective students, their parents and their advisers.

The scope of marketing was successfully broadened decades ago to include universities and other non-business organizations (Kotler and Levy 1969a, 1969b). Many other marketing academics have since discussed and demonstrated the benefits of applying marketing to services in general (Lovelock 1983; Swenson 1998) and higher education in particular (Hayes 1989; Miller et al. 1990). University business school administrations and other stakeholders should be interested in strategic marketing applications and any other actions that could have a significant impact upon performance levels. Nevertheless, the 'senior leaders' invoked in the Baldrige criteria may in principle accept the importance of quality, performance and continuous improvement, yet in practice resist the notion that academic institutions could or should consider students as customers.

The study reported here, part of a stream of continuing research, and is a further effort to encourage the application of strategic marketing theory and practice within higher education. We know, from previous empirical research (Hammond et al. 2006) that the behaviours and actions indicative of a high level of market orientation generally lead to higher levels of performance within university business schools. The research further indicates that emphasis by higher education leaders can positively impact market orientation levels. We also know that market orientation levels reported for private business schools are generally higher than those reported for public business schools (Webster et al. 2005).

The marketing concept advocates that all activities of a firm should be directed toward satisfying the customer. The market orientation construct has been developed, defined and measured to operationalize the implementation of the marketing concept. Narver & Slater (1990) and Kohli & Jaworski (1993) concluded that market orientation is the type of business culture and

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?