Biased Media Coverage Played a Role in IFP's Poor Performance at the Polls

Cape Times (South Africa), July 7, 2009 | Go to article overview

Biased Media Coverage Played a Role in IFP's Poor Performance at the Polls


BYLINE: Liezl van der Merwe

A report published by Media Monitoring Africa in March called "Is the media campaigning for the ANC and Cope?" reviewed media coverage given to all political parties during the 2009 general elections.

Media Monitoring Africa reported that the ANC received an average of 41 percent of party coverage, while newcomer Cope, which prior to the 2009 poll had no representation in Parliament, received 20 percent. The IFP, then the second largest opposition party in Parliament, received only 6 percent of coverage.

The 2009 elections were characterised by a great deal of discussion about bias in the media, particularly by the SABC. In its summary, Media Monitoring Africa concluded that concerns around bias in coverage are valid, though perhaps not for the reasons that may have been put forward. While it is reasonable to expect that the ANC would receive more media attention during the election period, the level of coverage is still debatable.

What should receive attention therefore, Media Monitoring Africa said, is not only the level of coverage afforded to one political party in comparison to others, but the content of the coverage.

This report has direct relevance to a cartoon that was published in the Cape Times on June 10 portraying Mangosuthu Buthelezi, leader of the Inkatha Freedom Party, as a defeated boxer. Lying in the corner of the ring he is clearly portrayed as being "out for the count". The IFP may have received 6 percent of the media coverage during the 2009 elections, but I would argue the gist of the coverage was argely negative. The IFP has consistently been portrayed as a party on the skids with no hope of ever recovering the political ground it has lost.

The media has often placed Buthelezi in the same basket as Patricia de Lille of the ID and Bantu Holomisa of the UDM, although both arguably enjoyed a fairer wind from the media. But the facts now speak for themselves: while the IFP has lost some support, the ID and the UDM have been practically wiped out (a situation from which no one should derive any pleasure).

Other smaller opposition parties, such as the ACDP and the FF+, also suffered severe losses but I am yet to come across a cartoon portraying their leaders in a negative light. I often wonder how these parties have been able to avoid the ridicule.

We all know that the media has |a vital role to play in any democracy - especially during elections. Bias in the media against a particular political party, or consistent negative coverage of a specific political party, is a matter that goes to the heart of how citizens vote.

I believe, like Media Monitoring Africa, that we must now look critically not only at the media coverage afforded to different political parties, but to the content of the coverage itself.

Prior to the April 22 poll, the pundits predicted that the IFP would be wiped off the electoral map. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Biased Media Coverage Played a Role in IFP's Poor Performance at the Polls
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.