The Future of Internet Domain Names: As the U.S. Government Pulls out, a Breach in Responsibility May Result

By Kennedy, Shirley Duglin | Information Today, March 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Future of Internet Domain Names: As the U.S. Government Pulls out, a Breach in Responsibility May Result


Kennedy, Shirley Duglin, Information Today


Who has the responsibility and authority for assigning Internet domain names? Well, right now, this issue is a very big deal.

Network Solutions (http://www.netsol.com), a private company based in Herndon, Virginia, is the current Keeper of the InterNIC (http://rs.internic. net). The company benefits from an exclusive contract from the U.S. government to register names in the most popular top-level domains: com, .net, and .org, as well as .edu. But Internet users have groused constantly about poor customer service as well as the domain registration fees--$100 for the first 2 years and $50 per year thereafter--that Network Solutions began charging in 1995.

More importantly, the U.S. wants out of the domain name business; the Clinton administration is interested in turning over this function to the private sector. The contract with Network Solutions was set to expire at the end of this month, although an option to extend it for another 6 months has been exercised. Ira Magaziner, President Bill Clinton's Internet policy advisor, wants to make sure that the government relinquishes its control over the domain name system "in a responsible manner."

A "green paper (draft proposal) issued January 30 by the U.S. Department of Commerce calls for the government to transfer control of the domain registration process to a new, private, nonprofit corporation by the end of September. According to the proposal, this corporation would be composed of representatives from various Internet stakeholder communities-domain registries, technical folks, and just plain users. To ensure stability, the government would continue to oversee policies until September 30, 2000.

The green paper recommends adding "up to five" new top-level domains, although it did not specify exactly what these would be. Meanwhile, a Geneva-based organization called the Council of Registrars (or CORE, at http://www.gtld-mou.org) had planned to implement its own scheme to register companies in seven new generic top-level domains: ".firm for businesses or firms; .shop for businesses offering goods to purchase; web for entities emphasizing activities related to the World Wide Web; .arts for entities emphasizing cultural and entertainment activities; .rec for entities emphasizing recreation/entertainment activities; info for entities providing information services; and .nom for those wishing individual or personal nomenclature, i.e., a personal nom de plume." The Commerce Department's draft proposal appears to throw this scheme into limbo.

The draft proposal makes some important distinctions between a registry and a registrar. A registry operates a domain database and adds/authenticates names to it. A registrar deals with customers/users and submits names to the registry. According to the draft proposal, both registry and registrar functions would be opened up to competition with any new domains to be controlled separately by single registries. For the time being, Network Solutions--which has been serving as both registry and registrar for .com, .net, .org, and .edu--will continue to act as registry for .com, .net, and .org, while the registrar function for these domains will be opened up to competition. Operation of the .edu domain will shift to a nonprofit organization.

One major concern expressed almost immediately after issuance of the green paper was that privatizing the domain name system and creating new domains would make it difficult for organizations to protect their trademarks across the Internet. Since commercial popularity of the Internet has mushroomed, there have been several celebrated cases of "cybersquatters" registering domain names corresponding to well-known brand names and trade-marks, hoping to cash in when corporations seek to buy the names. Adding top-level domains may force trademark holders to spend big bucks registering relevant domain names with each new registry. (To get some idea of the scope of this problem for multinational conglomerates, go to the InterNIC database search page at http://rs.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Future of Internet Domain Names: As the U.S. Government Pulls out, a Breach in Responsibility May Result
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?