NLC Backs Cost-Benefit Analysis to Smoke out Unfunded Mandates

By Cormier, Kristin E. | Nation's Cities Weekly, March 2, 1998 | Go to article overview

NLC Backs Cost-Benefit Analysis to Smoke out Unfunded Mandates


Cormier, Kristin E., Nation's Cities Weekly


NLC President Brian O'Neill urged the Senate to strengthen and adapt legislation to reduce the cost of unfunded federal regulatory mandates on cities. "There is little evidence," O'Neill testified, "of meaningful compliance with the Unfunded Federal Mandates Relief Act". It is especially important to get positive action on this bill to help all cities, but especially smaller cities."

The bill, the Regulatory Improvement Act of 1998 (S. 981) would include cost benefit analysis and risk assessment of new and current federal regulation in the rulemaking process and regulatory flexibility for small entities and locals governments. Cities and towns could reap substantial benefits through the improvements in the regulatory process that are included in this legislation. Benefits include helping municipal officials avert preemptive and costly regulations that are placed on local governments and gaining a more powerful voice in the regulatory rulemaking process.

These mandatory assessment procedures would occur as soon as a regulation is proposed by a federal agency and include quantifiable and non-quantifiable costs of the proposed rule. Rules involving health, safety, or environmental risk would also include a risk assessment.

Similar to the Unfunded Mandates Relief Act of 1995, the new bill would provide for the input of local, state, and tribal governments in the regulatory process. This would require federal agencies to ensure that cities would be able to provide meaningful and timely input into the development of regulatory proposals containing significant federal intergovernmental mandates. This type of partnership could save cities millions of dollars in burdensome regulations.

Costs of Regulation

Cities are directly affected by the high costs of federal regulation that have a significant economic impact. In the statement O'Neill submitted, he cited regulatory examples that need review. He said cities like:

* Shelton, Conn., with a population of 35,418, are impacted indirectly by the Clean Water Act through rate increases around 7 percent because of hydrant water charges from privately owned water supplies. The Clean Water Act has required sewerage authorities to take over a wide range of responsibilities, such as obtaining permits for point source discharges to publicly owned treatment works and direct discharges by industry.

* Midland, Mich. (population 37,250) faces requirements by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) on solid waste disposal that will increase the cost of disposal by 800 percent, despite the fact that the city landfill requires no liner due to 75 feet of clay.

* San Marcos, Tex. (population 28,743) is faced with higher tax and utility bills because of arbitrary standards on contaminants, analytical analysis, and treatment, in addition to public notification procedures that are borne by water suppliers that are mandate by the Safe Drinking Water Act. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

NLC Backs Cost-Benefit Analysis to Smoke out Unfunded Mandates
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.