David Garrick, George III, and the Politics of Revision

By Dircks, Phyllis T. | Philological Quarterly, Summer 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

David Garrick, George III, and the Politics of Revision

Dircks, Phyllis T., Philological Quarterly


A previously neglected manuscript of David Garrick's 1762 interlude, The Farmer's Return from London, provides fresh insight into the subtle pressures exerted upon theatre practitioners by the raging political climate of the 1760s. The Larpent Collection contains an uncompleted manuscript, the "Farmer's Return," dated only "1762," which Garrick submitted to the Lord Chamberlain's office.(1) There is no evidence of official censorship of the skit, yet the play, when staged at Drury Lane on 20 March 1762, was markedly different from the manuscript, having been cleansed of any references that might be considered offensive to the new King, as well as to the clergy and the theatre audience. The "Farmer's Return" is the only manuscript submitted by Garrick to the Lord Chamberlain that is unlike the printed version of the play.

The image of David Garrick created by biographers and commentators is that of an extraordinarily gifted, though vain, actor; of a successful theatre manager who demanded of his company the hard work and fierce dedication he himself possessed; of a careful and astute businessman; and of a clever and facile playwright.(2) The unifying characteristic in his varied activities was his finesse, a well-honed ability to communicate easily with people of all classes without risk of offending them.

The records of his professional life corroborate his sterling reputation. Of the forty-nine plays he either authored himself or adapted, mostly social satires and farces, none ran amok of the Examiner of Plays in the Lord Chamberlain's office. The playwright's voice is gently satiric, and the objects of his ridicule are type characters, such as Fribbles, country bumpkins, and unmarried conniving females. But the manuscript of The Farmer's Return from London, a skit depicting the reunion of a north country farmer with his affectionate family after a trip to London to witness the coronation of George III, challenges the widely accepted image of David Garrick. In the manuscript submitted to the Lord Chamberlain, Garricks farmer has a seemingly negative view of the coronation. More importantly, Garrick takes three unusual and uncharacteristic positions: (1) he is harshly satiric towards audiences and critics; (2) he makes derisive political references to the French, a sensitive political subject since the English were then battling them in the Seven Years War; and (3) he satirizes members of court, poking fun at a Bishop too young to have grown a beard, and mocking a Bishop and a Queen for their drunkenness.

When The Farmer's Return from London was staged at Drury Lane on 20 March 1762, fully six months after the coronation of George III, free of the uncharacteristically negative passages, it emerged principally as a character sketch of the country farmer, who, stupefied by the wonders of the capital, relates the details of Coronation week in leisurely style to his approving family. In performance, The Farmer adds new material; John recounts, in particular, his experiences with the Cock Lane ghost, a phenomenon which had recently captured the attention of Londoners, and he uses the story to tease his wife affectionately.

The wide disparity between the manuscript submitted to the Lord Examiner and the printed and performed versions of the play generates a number of interesting questions: What was Garrick's motivation in injecting offensive material into the play? What was his relationship to the royal family? To London clerics? What was Garricks involvement with the recent coronation of George III? When did he send the play to the Examiner of Plays? Did the political ferment of the early 1760s have any impact on the decision to recast the play? Finally and most important, who made the decision to censor The Farmer's Return from London?


As The Farmer's Return was designed as an interlude to be performed at a benefit performance for Hannah Pritchard, one of Garrick's leading actresses, the theme of the recent coronation of George III seemed appropriate, perhaps even ingenious.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

David Garrick, George III, and the Politics of Revision


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?