CHILD'S PLAY? No, There's More to a Baby's Mind Than You Think ... BOOK OF THE WEEK

Daily Mail (London), July 31, 2009 | Go to article overview

CHILD'S PLAY? No, There's More to a Baby's Mind Than You Think ... BOOK OF THE WEEK


Byline: Sam Leith

THE PHILOSOPHICAL BABY: WHAT CHILDREN'S MINDS TELL US ABOUT TRUTH, LOVE AND THE MEANING OF LIFE BY ALISON GOPNIK (Bodley Head [pounds sterling]14.99)

FIND a child under the age of one. See if you can persuade it to stop crying or being sick long enough to open its eyes.

Look hard and sympathetically into those cute, anxiously searching li'l peepers and ask it -- out loud, if you like; it won't understand you, still less be offended -- 'What in the name of God is going on in there?' Feel, as you ask the question, a proper thrill of awe and wonderment.

I do this pretty much constantly with my month-old daughter, just as I used to do it -- perhaps a bit more eccentrically, I admit -- with my cat.

And why not? The minds of other beings -- be they cats, babies or the people with whom we share our beds and our lives -- are a mystery. And the minds of pre-lingual infants are the king of all mysteries: because they are, among other things, our own minds.

Until quite recently, we knew more about the surface of the moon, or the floor of the San Marianas Trench, than we did about what goes on in a baby's head.

Freud made some guesses, Melanie Klein followed them up, and the impenetrable French theorist Jacques Lacan speculated about mirrors and omelettes.

But scientists hadn't the wherewithal to generate experimental data or, again until recently, much of an inclination.

Philosophers, meanwhile, took one look at the subject and decided that the question of whether existence precedes essence, or the nature of the transcendental unity of apperception, looked altogether less tricky to get the mental teeth into.

Children -- below the age at which they could expect to be corrupted by Socrates, at least -- barely appear in the history of western philosophy.

As Alison Gopnik reports, the index to the thousands of pages of a 1967 Encyclopedia Of Philosophy contained 'no references to babies, infants, families, parents, mothers, or fathers, and only four to children at all'.

Gopnik, a developmental psychologist with a professional sideline in philosophy, aims to supply that lack. The scientists have made some progress, and she's here to tell you about it.

HER BOOK is at its best and most interesting when talking about hard science (well, soft science, arguably) but modulates surefootedly enough into the philosophical implications when the occasion demands it.

For a good while, probably the most popular account of infant psychology was what Gopnik caricatures as the 'crying carrot' hypothesis: that children are essentially a bundle of automatic reflexes firing off in a continuous vegetative present-tense.

Yet she describes some ingeniously constructed research (none more ingenious, mind, than the scientist who decided to find out what went on in toddlers' heads by asking them; something nobody had thought of before) suggesting that in all sorts of cognitive departments children are incredibly sophisticated, incredibly young.

Between the ages of three and five, children are able to discern distinctions between law and morality; to have a more or less sophisticated theory of mind; to be able to make complicated inferences about the behaviour of the physical world; and to construct and test theories about the universe.

Also, less upliftingly, they are thoroughgoing little racists in the making.

Why do human beings, among all the animals, begin our lives with a year-long period of infancy during which we are more or less useless? We're cute, yes. Adorable, even. But by golly we need to be.

We can't keep ourselves warm, hunt food, reproduce, run away from predators, or do any of the things that so-called 'lesser' animals tend to make a priority from the get-go.

Instead, we mess around for years watching CBeebies, making potato prints and refusing to eat broccoli.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

CHILD'S PLAY? No, There's More to a Baby's Mind Than You Think ... BOOK OF THE WEEK
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.