Britart Has Stolen the Shock Tactics of the Avant-Garde, but Ignored the Subversive Agenda

By Jeffries, Stuart | New Statesman (1996), March 20, 1998 | Go to article overview

Britart Has Stolen the Shock Tactics of the Avant-Garde, but Ignored the Subversive Agenda


Jeffries, Stuart, New Statesman (1996)


In Los Angeles the pathologist Marc Pick is known as the Leonardo of dissections. He can skin a human head and torso whole, peel the face away from the skull complete with the ears, and hold this flesh up to the gaze. The photographer Pat York takes pictures of Dr Pick's dissected bodies, lovingly shooting the brains of corpses and seeing in them the houses of departed souls, of their dreams and passions.

Like Damien Hirst's pickled carcasses, these photographs make us reflect on our bodies' afterlives. Like Marc Quinn's Perspex head filled with the artist's own blood, they make us wonder at the stuff we are made of. Like driving slowly past a car crash, they make us think of death, even our own death. All these journeys through viscera are shocking, bringing us closer to what we may want to keep taboo - in art as in life.

Quinn's head, Hirst's shark and Pat York's photographs could be seen as avant-garde art, the shock of the new inscribed on the age-old story of death and decay. As Terry Eagleton recently wrote of avant-garde artists: "Each dissident generation of artists has denounced its predecessors as effete and escapist, as the running dogs of Renaissance princes or capitalist production. They, by contrast, have finally captured in the coils of art that slippery thing called Reality which has eluded everyone else."

And what could be more real than death? Not just the corpses drawn by Michelangelo, Da Vinci and Stubbs in order to further their understanding of anatomy, but the stuff of death itself, unflinchingly cabineted and firelessly exhibited before a shocked public.

But these cannot be examples of avant-garde art because the avant-garde died in the 1970s, unmourned and aged at least 100, not even dignified by a telegram from the Queen. How did it happen?

By the mid-1970s all isms were wasms and, according to Robert Hughes, avant-gardism was the biggest wasm of all: "This sudden metamorphosis of one of the popular cliches of art criticism into an unword took a very great many people by surprise. For those who believed that art had some practical revolutionary function, it was as baffling as the evaporation of the American radical left after 1970. The ideal - social renewal by cultural challenge - had lasted a hundred years, and its vanishing marked the end of an entire relationship - eagerly sought but not attained - of art to life."

The avant-garde began its life wandering the Parisian streets with Baudelaire, and reached its climax in the Cafe Voltaire of the Dadaists and in surrealism. It sought to blow up tradition through shocking public scandals: Duchamp's urinal in the gallery, the silent music played straight-faced in the concert hall. At the same time it prized secrecy, that very aloofness from society that made its radical critique of society possible.

In Eagleton's schematic history of dissident art, the 18th-century realist novel came first, dismissing the epic and pastoral as unreal productions of an out-of-touch aristocracy. But realism was criticised in the late-19th century for its respectable unreality, denounced by Ibsen, Zola and other writers of super-realist plays and novels. Then came the modernists, who abandoned society and submitted themselves to the flow of perception and the proddings of the unconscious.

In turn, these modernists were subverted by the revolutionary avant-garde, those Soviet artists who smashed their easels and set themselves to producing useful designs for workers. For them, the work of art stood in arrogant isolation from society, in defiant uselessness. With Aleksandr Rodchenko's two-colour posters "art had achieved truth in the act of immolating itself".

Actually, the death of the revolutionary avant-garde in the Soviet Union was not by its own hand. It was killed by something much more prosaic: Stalin and his philistine henchmen.

In any case, reports of the death of the avant-garde were greatly exaggerated. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Britart Has Stolen the Shock Tactics of the Avant-Garde, but Ignored the Subversive Agenda
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.