Building the City, Structuring Change: Portland's Implicit Utopian Project

By Hovey, Bradshaw | Utopian Studies, Winter 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Building the City, Structuring Change: Portland's Implicit Utopian Project

Hovey, Bradshaw, Utopian Studies

Among American Urban Planners, Portland, Oregon, is increasingly celebrated as a kind of planning utopia. Within the planning profession, and beyond, Portland is seen as a practical demonstration of how good planning, effective citizen participation, and regional growth management can produce what is commonly referred to as a good "quality of life." As one journalist wrote recently, "every week of the year, somebody arrives in Portland from far away, wanting to know the secrets of big-city livability" (Ehrenhalt 20). Indeed, Portland is widely recognized as a leader in downtown redevelopment, neighborhood revitalization, historic preservation, urban design control, mass transit development, and regional growth management Oliver). Elected officials, planners and urban managers flock from around the country, look at Portland, and wonder "why can't we do that?"

The answer is that there is no necessary reason why not. In the middle 1960s Portland was a stodgy town in a beautiful landscape, and more or less as vulnerable to the problems of urban decline and suburban growth as any other place in America (Peirce). What they have achieved, and what they are recognized for today, is the product of no less than 30 years of cumulative work toward a widely-shared and continuously discussed vision of what life in Portland could and should be. Few there call it "utopian," but it is.

In pursuing this vision, they have directly challenged most of the central assumptions about the structural constraints to achieving more livable cities: that downtowns must recede in prominence in favor of "Edge Cities," the highway-oriented agglomerations of suburban office, retail and residential space usurping the functions of historical downtowns (Garreau); that central city neighborhoods will decay, be annihilated intentionally, and then redeveloped in what is described as a natural process of evolution; and that the regime of automobile, highway, and low-density suburban development is irreversible, either because of technology, theologized "market forces," or because of the efforts of metropolitan "growth machines" (Logan and Molotch; Gottdiener).

My suggestion here is that Portland has effectively opposed these structural constraints, and achieved a more attractive urban way of life, through a long series of "structuring" events and projects. In the first instance these efforts directly challenged the structural status quo. But having succeeded in their original challenge, they have created in the second instance, a new structural context for action which makes a different and more desirable set of outcomes more likely than before. Not only do they "play the game," but they also re-write the rules.

Moreover, it is not merely material acts in the urban landscape which propel this process (restoring a neighborhood, building light rail transit, or removing a waterfront highway, which they have done), nor the organizational achievements that accompany them (structures of citizen participation, land use control agencies, which they have created). It is also the story that citizens of Portland tell about themselves and their achievements which at one stage can envision and propose the challenge to structural constraints, but at another stage enforce new social structures that allow them to further pursue a more attractive way of urban life (Seltzer).

In its most distilled form, Portland's story about itself is that the quality of urban spaces and places is of great importance to their community; that a combination of strong public leadership, informed planning practice and robust democratic life is necessary to achieve it; and that Portland is somehow different and better than other cities in that they have been able to overcome many of the major negative trends in urban development that others have suffered. It is important to keep in mind that Portland's story about itself -- or any community's story about itself -- is more than a concatenation of events, outcomes, and key players.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Building the City, Structuring Change: Portland's Implicit Utopian Project


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?