Spearthrower Performance: Ethnographic and Experimental Research

By Hutchings, W. Karl; Bruchert, Lorenz W. | Antiquity, December 1997 | Go to article overview

Spearthrower Performance: Ethnographic and Experimental Research


Hutchings, W. Karl, Bruchert, Lorenz W., Antiquity


Even after decades of spearthrower studies, researchers have relatively little reliable data on spearthrower performance, and yet prehistoric lifeways are often reconstructed through consideration of the capabilities of such weapon systems. Experimental study and considered dependence on ethnographic knowledge clarify the realitites of the spearthrower in use.

Introduction

The spearthrower is known from the circumpolar regions, western Europe, and throughout most of North America, Central and South America, Australia, Melanesia and Micronesia. It has been in use since at least the Magdalenian of Upper Palaeolithic Europe approximately 17,000 years ago, and perhaps much earlier (cf. Caton-Thompson 1946; Knecht 1994). Although it is commonly held that Palaeoindian peoples of the New World employed the spearthrower to aid in depletion of late Pleistocene megafauna, it is not until after the Palaeoindian Period, between 9000 and 10,000 years ago, that the earliest evidence for its use is found at Warm Mineral Springs (Cockrell & Murphy 1978; Clausen et al. 1975; Royal & Clark 1960) and Marmes Rockshelter (Rice 1972; Sheppard et al. 1987). Interestingly, the spearthrower continued to be used in many areas of the New World long after the adoption of the bow, surviving until the 1960s in Mexico (Stirling 1960). Despite its eventual replacement, the spearthrower offers several advantages that may account for its persistence among various cultures (Raymond 1986); we believe one of the most important of these is the ability of the spearthrower to impart a much greater projectile force than the bow.

The bulk of spearthrower research has been concerned with how the device functions to increase propulsion (Browne 1940; Butler 1975; Howard 1974; Patterson 1977; Perkins 1992), often concentrating on the role of spearthrower weights; various-sized and shaped stones occasionally attached to New World, flexible-type spear throwers (Peers 1960; Raymond 1985; Tolley & Barnes 1979). While such studies are necessary, we agree with Dickson (1985: 10) that 'the physics of the [spearthrower per se] are of less interest to anthropologists than the performance characteristics and capabilities of the weapon'.

A survey of the current literature reveals considerable disparity in assessments of spearthrower effectiveness. Unlike bow-and-arrow technologies, which have been reasonably well researched over the past century, archaeologists have little reliable data regarding the most important variables of spearthrower performance; dart weights, effective range and projectile velocity. We expect these variables to affect important archaeological concerns, such as projectile point breakage patterns, and studies of subsistence patterning and technological change, and thus have a ripple effect on the analysis of human behaviour.

Several factors contribute to the current variability in our knowledge of spearthrower performance. The most important of these may be a general lack of familiarity and requisite skill with the device. In a pioneering experimental study, Browne (1940: 211) stated 'any close degree of accuracy is impossible with the atlatl and the spear.' His description of throwing technique explains why: 'The throw is a fast overhand sweep [that] lifts the spear to a height above the head equal to the length of both the arm and the atlatl and this uncontrolled throw is the cause of the large angle of error' (1940: 211-12). This basic error in throwing technique was repeated by both Butler (1975: 105) and Patterson (1977: 159), and may account for a generalized perception of the spearthrower as an awkward and inaccurate weapon.

Kinesiological studies of throwing technique indicate that more than half of a spear's final velocity can be attributed to rotational acceleration of the wrist and forearm (Cooper & Glassow 1968: 122); the same is true for the spearthrower dart. In comparison, there is little velocity imparted by the straight-armed sweeping motion described by Browne (1940: 211). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Spearthrower Performance: Ethnographic and Experimental Research
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.