Exploitation of Wild Plants by the Early Neolithic Hunter-Gatherers of the Western Desert, Egypt: Nabta Playa as a Case-Study

By Wasylikowa, Krystyna; Mitka, Jozef et al. | Antiquity, December 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Exploitation of Wild Plants by the Early Neolithic Hunter-Gatherers of the Western Desert, Egypt: Nabta Playa as a Case-Study


Wasylikowa, Krystyna, Mitka, Jozef, Wendorf, Fred, Schild, Romuald, Antiquity


The role of plants in the subsistence economy of pre-agricultural societies of the eastern Sahara is poorly known because vegetal remains, except for wood charcoal, are seldom found in archaeological sites. Site E-75-6 at Nabta Playa, with rich assemblages of charred seeds and fruits, is exceptional. Around 8000 b.p. the inhabitants of this site collected a wide spectrum of wild food plants. Wild sorghum was of special interest and its occasional cultivation cannot be excluded.

Many of the species identified at Nabta Playa belong to edible plants which have been gathered for food across northern Africa until recent times. Their utilization by people living at that site seems highly probable, even if no direct evidence was found in the form of one-species accumulations. The occurrence of plant remains, in several huts and pits of almost the same age of around 8000 b.p., created the opportunity to examine their in-site distribution, and to discover how plants were exploited. A multivariate method of correspondence analysis was used, with the results that are the subject of this article.

The site

Nabta Playa is a large internal drainage basin, in the driest part of the Egyptian Western Desert. During wet episodes of the early Holocene the basin was inhabited several times by early Neolithic nomadic populations (Wendorf & Schild 1980). At site E-75-6 three archaeological levels were discovered; the plant material discussed here comes from the middle level (Wasylikowa et al. 1995).

Settlement traces include remnants of huts, pits and wells, distributed along the former lake shore in a belt about 70 m long and 20 m broad [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 1 OMITTED]. In the huts, there were one to five hearths and several small and shallow pits interpreted as pot-holes, i.e. places where containers with food were placed for cooking in hot ashes. Eleven AMS dates, based on individual seeds from different huts, gave ages between 8025[+ or -]120 (Oxa-3220) and 7950[+ or -]90 (Oxa-3484) b.p. (Wasylikowa et al. 1993; Wendorf et al. 1992).

At earlier stages of the early Neolithic, the site was inundated by summer rains; it was probably inhabited in the fall and winter. Later, habitation could have lasted the whole year, as it is indicated by walk-in wells connected with the middle level (Wendorf et al. in press). Food procurement was based on hunting (mainly of gazelle and hare), cattle-keeping, and wild-plant gathering. Occasional cultivation of wild sorghum was possible, although this cannot be proven.

Plant remains

Seeds and fruits were recovered by dry-sieving soil samples of known volume. All were preserved in a charred condition. For each sample the exact location on the excavation grid [TABULAR DATA FOR TABLE 1 OMITTED] was recorded as well as the context: hearth, pot-hole, post-hole, house fill (lower level), house fill top (upper level). For each identified taxon or morphological type, the number of specimens was recorded for each sample.

The accumulation of plant remains resulted from human activity with various purposes: wood for fuel; seeds, fruits, tubers and rhizomes for food; other uses - medicinal and magic? Charring could have taken place only near the hearths, or possibly near pot-holes; there is no evidence that any of the houses were burned. Charred material was scattered all over the surface of the house floor when the house was occupied; in addition, there may have been secondary mixing after the houses were abandoned. The abandoned site was covered by sands and silts which preserved the charred plant remains. The generally uniform appearance of all charred remains, indicating similar conditions of preservation throughout the site, suggests the composition of the archaeobotanical samples not having been changed selectively by post-depositional processes.

Seeds, fruits, tubers and rhizomes found in the huts probably represent residues of cooking and wastes of plant-processing for food or other purposes.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Exploitation of Wild Plants by the Early Neolithic Hunter-Gatherers of the Western Desert, Egypt: Nabta Playa as a Case-Study
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?