Using Technology to Monitor Offenders: A Community Corrections Perspective

By DeMichele, Matthew; Payne, Brian | Corrections Today, August 2009 | Go to article overview

Using Technology to Monitor Offenders: A Community Corrections Perspective


DeMichele, Matthew, Payne, Brian, Corrections Today


Everyone involved with the criminal justice system is aware that correctional population figures have grown steadily for the past 30 years. Currently, the community corrections field monitors more than 5 million adults, and prisons and jails hold around 2.3 million adults, the Bureau of Justice Statistics reports. As the country works through a major economic downturn, the community corrections field is searching for ways to improve organizational efficiency by instituting a series of systematic practices to identify optimal procedures. Referred to as evidence-based (or data-driven) practices, they encourage community corrections agencies to use social science evaluation methods to improve organizational functioning. (1) Technologies that monitor offenders have gained the attention of the community corrections field and, thus, are constantly being studied and evaluated to determine effectiveness.

Exaggerated claims and beliefs about what any particular technology can do for the monitoring process, however, have created misconceptions of monitoring strategies. (2) It is important to note that technologies used to monitor offenders in the community have both benefits and drawbacks. They are inanimate objects, machines or devices that should be understood as tools that have the potential to improve community supervision when appropriately implemented, evaluated and adjusted. However, they are not magical, they require humans to operate them and they will not solve all correctional population issues. (3)

Community corrections populations are likely to increase in the near future as states look for alternatives to prisons and jails. This movement is what Rios and Greene (4) refer to as a justice reinvestment movement in which policymakers and correctional authorities in a number of states are looking for, implementing and evaluating a "comprehensive strategy" that will use tax dollars more wisely by "investing" in effective community supervision practices. In fact, in reaction to the economic downfall, some states have called upon community corrections officials to use monitoring technologies to allow for the early release of offenders from jail or prison as a strategy to offset declining state budgets.

Understanding the Concept of Monitoring

Before anyone can say what a technology should or could do for monitoring offenders in the community, it is necessary to first understand what is meant by "monitoring." Research suggests that effective monitoring strategies should incorporate several key practices, including risk assessments, positive and negative reward structures, powerful officer-offender interactions, cognitive-behavioral treatments, vocational training and education. (5)

Indeed, many different practices are used to monitor offenders in the community, including classifying offenders by risk, needs and change levels. Once these determinations are made, officers can design a monitoring strategy that (hopefully) involves treatment, surveillance and enforcement. Paparozzi and DeMichele (2008) (6) build on prior research to offer definitions of these terms: "Treatment [utilizes] risk assessment, case supervision planning and service delivery; surveillance involves the rigorous monitoring of the case supervision plan; and enforcement requires coerced compliance with case supervision plans through a variety of mechanisms including return to jail or prison."

Paparozzi and DeMichele go further to suggest that the community corrections field occupies a unique position within the U.S. criminal justice system. While prisons and jails seem to shift between either providing treatment or providing punishment through incapacitation, community corrections agencies have always been mandated with achieving the dual role of providing mechanisms to motivate offender behavioral change as well as restrictive mechanisms that incapacitate offenders through an assortment of conditions that suspend several civil liberties.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Using Technology to Monitor Offenders: A Community Corrections Perspective
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.