The Abolition of Capital Punishment in Britain

By Phillips, Tom | Contemporary Review, February 1998 | Go to article overview

The Abolition of Capital Punishment in Britain


Phillips, Tom, Contemporary Review


On 13 August 1964, in Walton prison, Liverpool, and Strangeways prison, Manchester, respectively, Peter Allen and Gwynne Evans were taken from the condemned cells and led to the execution chamber. A few minutes later, the last two men to be hanged in Britain met their deaths. The following year, on 27 October 1965, the Murder (Abolition of the Death Penalty) Bill - originally proposed by the Labour MP Sidney Silverman in December 1964 - successfully completed its passage through both Houses of Parliament and capital punishment was abolished for a trial period of five years. In December 1969, this temporary abolition was made permanent. All subsequent attempts to reintroduce the death penalty for murder have failed. Britain retains certain capital statutes which would, for example, allow for the execution of traitors in war-time. Although it is often claimed that the majority of the population would, if given the chance, vote to bring back hanging for particularly brutal offences, a return to the pre-1965 capital code seems unlikely in the foreseeable future.

In retrospect, of course, it is tempting to regard the abolition of the death penalty as inevitable and, therefore, irreversible. In fact, it seems as if capital punishment had been on the way out ever since the first murmurings of doubt about its efficacy were heard in the eighteenth century. From that time on, the procedures of execution underwent a series of reforms and the long advance towards abolition appeared to have begun. In London, the traditional Tyburn procession to the gallows was abolished in 1783. 'Aggravated punishments' such as post-mortem decapitation, anatomization or gibbeting were phased out in the 1820s and 1830s. In 1868, public executions were abolished altogether. Broadly speaking, the rate of execution also fell. In 1805 - the first year for which national figures are available - there were 68 hangings: in 1923 there were 11 and by the 1950s it was unusual for more than 3 or 4 people to be executed in any one year. In the space of two hundred years, capital punishment changed beyond all recognition. The regular public spectacles of suffering of the 1760s had become, by the 1960s, infrequent private rituals which, it would seem, the State performed with increasing reluctance. Given the general direction of reform, abolition appears to have been the logical conclusion of a long-running historical trend. It is as if capital punishment were a disease whose more appalling symptoms slowly got better until a complete cure was effected in 1965.

Such a reassuringly linear narrative, however, is misleading. It underestimates the astonishing resistance there was to abolition, suggests that reforms were introduced with eventual abolition in mind and implies that capital punishment was gradually refined until, quite literally, it refined itself out of existence. As it happens, none of the reforms identified above were necessarily humane innovations. Although they appear to make capital punishment more orderly and efficient, they were not introduced with the aim of reducing the suffering of the condemned.

Take the abolition of the Tyburn procession, for example. Before 1783, condemned prisoners due to be hanged at Tyburn in London were held in Newgate prison. On the morning of their execution, they were released from their prison irons and pinioned with rope and began their journey through the streets to the scaffold. Those convicted of treason were dragged on a hurdle: those guilty of other offences rode in a cart. The latter were usually made to sit on a coffin wearing a shroud. As they passed St Sepulchre's, they were exhorted to repent by the sexton of the church. When notorious felons, such as the thief-taker Jonathan Wild, were taken to be hanged, huge crowds lined the streets and the journey, interrupted from time to time so that the prisoner could converse with friends or take a drink at a tavern, could last several hours. Not every Tyburn procession was as riotous but the crowd at the scaffold itself was rarely less than three thousand strong.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Abolition of Capital Punishment in Britain
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.