"Can We Save Veblen and Ayres from Their Saviors? A Response to Professor Klein." (Philip A. Klein)(response to David Hamilton in This Issue, P 1051)
Klein, Philip A., Journal of Economic Issues
One presumes from this title that I have so badly misinterpreted Ayres in my recent essay, "Ayres on Institutions" [1995], that he needs to be "saved" from my dreadful misinterpretations. My purpose in writing the essay was to suggest that in one area, namely his perspective on institutions, Ayres presented a one-sided view.
Certainly, Professor Hamilton says many things with which I (and perhaps most institutionalists) would agree - e.g., "The obsolescence of the institutions is a function of the onward march of the mobilized technology." It is replete with a long discussion of the durability of the role of institutions including many historical examples. While all this is not ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: "Can We Save Veblen and Ayres from Their Saviors? A Response to Professor Klein." (Philip A. Klein)(response to David Hamilton in This Issue, P 1051).
Contributors: Klein, Philip A. - Author.
Journal title: Journal of Economic Issues.
Volume: 31.
Issue: 4
Publication date: December 1997.
Page number: 1057+.
© 1999 Association for Evolutionary Economics.
COPYRIGHT 1997 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset