The 'Good Faith' Controversy in Australian Commercial Law: A Survey of the Spectrum of Academic Legal Opinion

By Munro, Howard | University of Queensland Law Journal, July 2009 | Go to article overview

The 'Good Faith' Controversy in Australian Commercial Law: A Survey of the Spectrum of Academic Legal Opinion


Munro, Howard, University of Queensland Law Journal


In academic debate the question is frequently asked as to whether the implied obligation of good faith has any place within the common law of contract in Australia, and if so, does it apply to all commercial contracts or only to some? For example, recent contributions to the good faith debate include a speech given in 2006 by Mr Justice Robert McDougall of the New South Wales Supreme Court on The Implied Duty of Good Faith in Australian Contract Law. (1) Another recent survey is a paper by Geoffrey Kuehne published in the University of Western Australia Law Review on Implied Obligations of Good Faith and Reasonableness in the Performance of Contracts: Old Wine in New Bottles. (2)

In the speech given by Mr Justice McDougall, he argues that the contractual duty of good faith is here to stay 'barring avulsive change on the part of the legislature or the High Court' (3) and that 'it is likely to be developed by accretion over the years, as our understanding of the concept--both as to its contractual source and its content--deepens through further decisions'. (4)

As to the source of the obligation, His Honour regards the question of whether it is derived by implication in fact or law or by means of construction as 'being to some extent a matter of semantics'. (5) Regarding the meaning of good faith, His Honour prefers Sir Anthony Mason's classic definition, namely:

(1) An obligation on the parties to co-operate in achieving the contractual objects (loyalty to the promise itself).

(2) Compliance with honest standards of conduct.

(3) Compliance with standards of conduct that are reasonable having regard to the interests of the parties. (6)

However, as to whether 'reasonable conduct' is objective or subjective, His Honour leaves that to be decided in each case depending of the proper construction of the intention of the parties.

Geoffrey Kuehne, on the other hand, takes a different tack in his survey of the notion of good faith in Australian contract law. He begins with an examination of the traditional methods of controlling contractual performance, (viz. the implied term of cooperation, as well as equitable remedies) and then examines good faith in foreign jurisdictions, followed by a survey of the major Australian cases on good faith. The conclusion Kuehne draws is that:

   Examination of the decisions in Renard and Burger King reveals that
   the results wrought by the application of good faith or
   reasonableness could have been achieved by the application of the
   implied obligation of co-operation, complemented by traditional
   equitable restraints on the exercise of contractual powers. (7)

Kuehne draws support for his position from the opinion of Gummow J in Service Station Association Ltd v Berg Bennett & Associates Pty Ltd (8) where, as Kuehne points out, 'His Honour observed that the origins of the term [good faith] did not appear to differ from those of another implied term more familiar to Australian law, namely the implied obligation of co-operation'. (9)

As a result, Kuehne takes the view that:

   Gummow J's observation that the obligations of co-operation and
   good faith had shared origins might well be matched by the
   conclusion that, many years later, they have arrived at the same
   place. Indeed it might be concluded that implied obligations of
   good faith and reasonableness amount to little more than old wine
   in new bottles. (10)

The contributions by Mr Justice McDougall and Geoffrey Kuehne exemplify a tendency in the secondary literature to take positions either in favour of the development of good faith in contact law (McDougall) or against it (Kuehne, following the lead of Gummow J). There are many such examples, some of which will be examined here. The problem is that the commentators cannot agree on much, so there is an impasse in the academic debate. Given the absence of a High Court ruling on the place of good faith in Australian contract law, this only adds to the confusion. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The 'Good Faith' Controversy in Australian Commercial Law: A Survey of the Spectrum of Academic Legal Opinion
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.