Database Secrets of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office

By Jack, Robert F. | Searcher, May 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Database Secrets of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office


Jack, Robert F., Searcher


Sophisticated users of information (whether in hard copy or electronic format) generally recognize the value in searching patents when seeking solutions to scientific and technical problems. According to law and custom, patents go to the original. This writer holds the personal axiom that NOBODY is all THAT original -- chances are, whatever the question or problem, someone somewhere has already articulated and addressed it, at least to some extent, in the course of what we call civilized history. Indeed, this is the principal reason that I remain in the field of information services; I begin every inquiry with the presumption that there is information, somewhere, to be gleaned.

Before one can understand the importance of the information-gathering process within the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), one must understand to some extent the nature of patents. I will be the first to admit that I am in no way an authority on this subject. Not only do I have little understanding of patent law, I don't even consider myself a truly competent searcher of patent databases.

[For an excellent (if slightly dated) discussion of patents and how to search patent databases, see Edlyn S. Simmons' "Patents" chapter in the Manual of Online Search Strategies, edited by C. J. Armstrong and J. A. Large (Boston: G. K. Hall & Co., 1987, pp. 84-156). Regular readers of Searcher have also seen excellent contributions from such luminaries as Nancy Lambert. Those of you who just can't stay off the Internet should check out the official site of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (http:// www.uspto.gov). When you've finished there, get the quick inside take from our friends, the experts in the Patent Information Users Group (http://www. questel.orbit.com/piug in the U.S. or http://www.derwent.co.uk/archive/piug in Great Britain).

All Right, Mr. Know-It-All, So What's a Patent?

Basically, a patent is an official recognition by the government (any government, but generally national or federal authority rather than a provincial, state, or local entity) that an individual or a group of individuals has created a new product or process, theoretically after some appreciable research and effort; that this new product or process substantially advances the state of science or technology; and that such individuals should have the exclusive right to use or sell this product or process for a certain period of time. The word "patent" itself has an older meaning. It referred originally to any sort of charter that gave someone the express approval of the authorities to engage in some act, or control some resource, to some degree of exclusivity.

Thus throughout literature you may see references to "land patents" and similar expressions.

But there is a trade-off inventors must make in return for gaining patents. They must state specifically what about the invention makes it unique, nonobvious, and so on. Moreover, they have to explain how it works in sufficient detail so that "one skilled in the art" (in general, a patent examiner) can determine that (a) it works, and (b) it's new. In the early days of U.S. Patent history (there's a nice overview in Robert O. Richardson's The Weird & Wondrous World of Patents, New York: Sterling Publishing, 1990), an inventor would assemble his invention, document it in an application for a patent, and send it (or bring it) for examination by the Patent Commissioners (one of whom was Thomas Jefferson). In the 19th century they generally abolished the requirement to provide a working model, partly because of physical limitations of storage space and partly due to several fires. However, an individual patent examiner today can still require the construction of a working model if that is the only way to demonstrate that the invention truly works. (I have heard rumors that the Patent Examining Corps have an unofficial rule that any device claiming to be a perpetual-motion machine must be constructed for examination, since such a device would by definition violate the laws of physics as we currently understand them.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Database Secrets of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?