WHICH ONE GETS YOUR VOTE? the Final Winner of the [Pounds Sterling]25,000 Threadneedle Prize Is Decided by the Public and the Poll Is Now Open - If Only the Shortlist Were Stronger; EXHIBITION OF THE WEEK

The Evening Standard (London, England), August 27, 2009 | Go to article overview

WHICH ONE GETS YOUR VOTE? the Final Winner of the [Pounds Sterling]25,000 Threadneedle Prize Is Decided by the Public and the Poll Is Now Open - If Only the Shortlist Were Stronger; EXHIBITION OF THE WEEK


Byline: Brian Sewell

THE THREADNEEDLE PRIZE SHOW Mall Galleries, SW1

On Wednesday next week, 2 September, the anniversary of the first flame of the Great Fire of London, an exhibition of paintings and sculptures entered for this year's Threadneedle Prize will open at the Mall Galleries. Threadneedle is a discreet investment management company working largely on behalf of institutions. Some of its directors collect paintings of a kind that, unfaddy and unfashionable in the polenta-eating purlieus of Islington, are dismissed by the Arts Council and the various Tates as of no interest. "no interest" is a portmanteau description of canvases not propped on the stools of elephants, not breaking into the third dimension with the addition of a dead cat or used condom to the surface, and small enough to hang in the front parlour of a semidetached house in Ponders End, of paintings that depict such silly old-fashioned things as landscape, still life and the figure - particularly the figure.

As taxpayers, these Threadneedle men observed that the painters of paintings of the kind they like and want to live with are never supported in any way by these state agencies of art, though annually they dispense many tens of millions in support of supposed artists who, in order to attract attention, deliberately break the ancient boundaries of art. For these subversive jackanapes the Tate and the Arts Council provide grants and commissions and exhibition space, issue catalogues and press releases, and, best of all, provoke the daily press into denouncing their challenges to reason, for offending the Sun and Daily Mail is the surest path to notoriety and yet more public funding.

Asking themselves what might be done to turn this ridiculous situation on its head and bring to the fore the very artists whose work the state's arm's-length agencies proscribe, the Threadneedle men last year instituted the Threadneedle Prize for Figurative Art. This generated an immediate squabble over the definition of the word figurative. Obdurately at one end of the scale, I took figurative to require the representation of a figure, either as the prime subject, as in Velazquez's Rokeby Venus, or engaged in some activity, as in the rank of figures watching his Boar Hunt (both in the National Gallery); at the other end, opposing me, were those who thought figurative another word for broadly representative and thus applicable to anything not abstract. This loose interpretation triumphed and this year the prize is merely The Threadneedle Prize, and only in the unprofessionalism of those competing for it is its exhibition distinguishable from that hoary annual, the New English Art Club.

With Figurative dropped from its title, the prize seems to have lost its artpolitical punch, purpose and determination to return to the human body its ancient primacy in all its beauties and its uglinesses too. Without Figurative in its title the prize does nothing to urge artists to explore the well of symbolism in the body naked and the body clothed, nothing to define the line between abstractions of physical beauty and erotica, nothing to plumb the heroic misery perceived by the Russian Itinerants in the serfdom of their day, and nothing to engage in the tyrannical, exalted, spiritual and unhinged of ours - that is, nothing to attach the painters of today to the ancestral interests of the painters of the past.

Forget landscape and still life; beautiful though these can be, they are only adjuncts on the edges of great painting. Yes, yes - I hear you shouting the names of Turner and Constable, Chardin and Melendez, William Nicholson and Eliot Hodgkin, but it was not landscape and still life that made great artists of Leonardo, Michelangelo and Raphael, though all to some degree explored it, nor of Bernini, Canova and Rodin who, as sculptors, were denied these subsidiaries as subjects. Compared with a century ago, landscape and still life may seem to languish now but they have not been abandoned to anything like the extent to which we have lost the human figure as the central subject of European art and are still the stock-in-trade of artists in their thousands, of dealers and collectors and exhibitions too.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

WHICH ONE GETS YOUR VOTE? the Final Winner of the [Pounds Sterling]25,000 Threadneedle Prize Is Decided by the Public and the Poll Is Now Open - If Only the Shortlist Were Stronger; EXHIBITION OF THE WEEK
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.