Our Abdiel: The British Press and the Lionization of 'Chinese' Gordon

By Miller, Brook | Nineteenth-Century Prose, Fall 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Our Abdiel: The British Press and the Lionization of 'Chinese' Gordon


Miller, Brook, Nineteenth-Century Prose


Press coverage surrounding the 1886 death of Charles 'Chinese' Gordon in Khartoum, Sudan, provides an exemplary instance of the functioning of imperial discourse. Surprisingly, Gordon's lionization as a charismatic imperial leader emerged from lacunae in reporting and as a response to international criticism rather than as justification for his intervention. As British resistance to a fundamentalist uprising in the Sudan weakened and failed, previously diverse representations of British imperial activity became more unified. After his death, Gordon was nostalgically celebrated as an anomalous representative of a heroic imperial past. At the same time, within a generalizable press consensus about the meaning of the events at Khartoum, inchoate critiques of imperial ideology nonetheless emerged.

**********

While theorists of imperial ideology generally point out its discursive nature, too often analyses of imperial texts overlook the conditions of production that generate visions of racial and national heroism. This article examines factors that contributed to the elevation of Charles "Chinese" Gordon to martyrdom, and it argues that the consolidation of his image was a response to imperial competition and resentment, the empowerment of the press, and economic factors. In this instance Orientalist rhetoric about English superiority did not simply express a national political unconscious. Instead, unified visions of the British mission appeared strategically to fill in gaps in press coverage, in response to the criticisms of foreign antagonists, and as a result of competition in the newspaper and publishing industries.

From late January 1884 through the spring of 1885, the British public consumed a prodigious output of news about the actions and the fate of General Charles "Chinese" Gordon in the Sudan (Brown 133). Gordon's death at the hands of Sudanese rebels enraged an adoring British public, who viewed the general as an archetype of missionary imperialism, of the Englishman willing to sacrifice all for the betterment of the primitive Other. Jan Morris places Gordon among "a diverse succession of visionaries [who] gave [the British empire] a metaphysical dimension" in the late Victorian period (70). The press was full of stories of imperial adventure and conflict, and the spectacle of a virtuous Englishman confronting despotism, fanaticism, and especially the slave trade reassured many members of the British public of the righteousness of the imperial mission. In this context, Gordon was "everything a legend-maker could require," possessed of a "hypnotic ... [and] grand" personality, and whose modesty, ideas about Christian duty, and service to Britain made him an embodiment of the imperial ideal (Morris 73-74). These characteristics made Gordon the darling of newspapers like the Pall Mall Gazette (PMG). Yet even during the height of the siege Gordon claimed to "dwell on the joy of never seeing Great Britain again," and he repeatedly disparaged the press that went to such lengths to celebrate him, as in the following passage: "I think the Press is first-rate, to ventilate articles ... they are most useful" (Gordon 161, 42). Gordon's iconoclasm seems surprising given his near iconic status as an imperial hero. Why, then, would the press lionize a leader disgusted by contemporary Britain and cynical about the press' role in shaping public opinion? The rhetorical elevation of Gordon provides a signature example of the complex representational dynamics of the late Victorian empire.

Gordon's voyage to the Sudan was in fact a return--he had spent several years in the 1870s as Governor-General, during which he had rather ineffectually attempted to curb the Arab slave trade. British interest in Egypt was focused upon the Suez Canal, the quickest passage to the Indian subcontinent. In the Sudan, the slave trade and oppressive tax collection, among other factors, had stimulated enormous resentment among both the Arab and African tribes.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Our Abdiel: The British Press and the Lionization of 'Chinese' Gordon
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?