A Reading in Comparative Aesthetics: Arnold as Indian Sage?

By Ghosh, Ranjan | Nineteenth-Century Prose, Spring-Fall 2007 | Go to article overview

A Reading in Comparative Aesthetics: Arnold as Indian Sage?


Ghosh, Ranjan, Nineteenth-Century Prose


Comparative aesthetics is the critical attitude in reading that opens up perceptive spaces by dehegemonizing the dominant tool of reading the text and dehermetizing it with more critical lubrications imported from a variety of literature and theory. Riding on such a comparatist orientation, this paper revisits Arnold's poetics and tries to evolve a concept of the Poet; but in a comparatist attitude that reinvests several dimensions--significance of 'subject' for the poet, choice of action and emotion, poetic structure, touchstone thesis--the paper looks into the possibilities of extending his thoughts through a critical and well meaning paradigm-meshing. Homing on the paradigms of structure, subject, propriety, artistic wholeness etc. the ideas of several Sanskrit thinkers are brought into play and also some ideas of Rabindranath Tagore which might apparently look incongruous. In fact, it is the leveling out of such apparent incongruities that comparative aesthetics needs to accomplish. Can Arnold's ideas on poet and poetry be reperspectivized through such Sanskritic and Tagorean points of view? With what critical profundity does his thought and ideas respond to this comparative approach? The paper explores these possibilities and tries to refigure Arnoldian poetics on a hitherto unexamined grid.

**********

The object of this paper is to compare Matthew Arnold's ideas of poetry, the poet, and creativity with those of Indian Sanskrit aesthetics and with Rabindranath Tagore's (1) theory of art. My view of comparative aesthetics hinges on formal, foundational principles and leads me to experiment with ideas drawn from other literatures. I seek to re-view the principles and precepts that contribute to the formation of specific works of art, and to examine Arnold's notion of poet, and his basic principles of philosophy and poetic structure within a broad comparatist reading. (2)

I

Arnold writes,

Everything depends on the reality of a poet's classic character. If he is a dubious classic, let us sift him; if he is a false classic, let us explode him. But if he is a real classic, if his work belongs to the class of the very best ..., then the great thing for us is to feel and enjoy his work as deeply as ever we can, and to appreciate the wide difference between it and all work which has not the same high character." (3) (Arnold 1964: 239)

What then lends such distinctive attributes to the formation of the poet? The poet's attention should be fixed upon excellent models: the "subject" must be human actions that appeal to elementary feelings, independent of time. The Greeks used "great action" to control and govern the structure of poetry. Sanskrit literary theory in general also introduces the paradigm of visaya (subject), which determines the character of the artistic creation and aesthetic enjoyment (reference can be drawn to Siddhantamuktavali belonging to the Nyaya school). For Arnold, there is the relation between visaya and proyojana (another important paradigm in Sanskrit literary criticism), which means purpose. Anandavardhana and Abhinavagupta instruct the poets to be very careful in constructing their plot, character, situation and language following the principle of propriety. There are five successive stages in the entire plan of poetic composition: selection of the main plot, addition of sub plots, carrying the action toward fruition, concentration upon the sentiments (rasa), and arrangement of characters, situation, ornament, etc. proper to the desired sentiment. Arnold evinces such principles of organization and culls "actions" that possess an inherent interest. This becomes the "binding effect" of the final poetic discourse. Visaya in the Sanskrit poetical tradition is commonly held to mean something that "regulates" or "directs"; the prefix vi accordingly implies "characteristics," and the root si is indicative of the sense of "binding." Embedding the visaya in human action that appeals to elementary feelings (sthayibhavas), the poet is expected to provide the binding effect.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Reading in Comparative Aesthetics: Arnold as Indian Sage?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.