Positioning Women's Rights within Asylum Policy: A Feminist Analysis of Political Persecution

By Zeigler, Sara L.; Stewart, Kendra B. | Frontiers - A Journal of Women's Studies, June 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Positioning Women's Rights within Asylum Policy: A Feminist Analysis of Political Persecution


Zeigler, Sara L., Stewart, Kendra B., Frontiers - A Journal of Women's Studies


INTRODUCTION AND METHODS

As a nation founded by and comprised of immigrants, the United States has surrounded its policy on political asylum with a certain mythology. Although no serious student of immigration policy expects the reality to match the rhetoric emblazoned on the Statute of Liberty, the gendered aspects of the policy have received only cursory public attention, usually in the aftermath of high-profile cases and with clearly articulated fears that a recognition of the fact that sex-based persecution is a political act would open the floodgates to literally millions of refugees. After all, more than half of the world's population could offer credible claims that their human rights are marginalized, disregarded, or neglected in their home countries, including American women. (1) Such fears have been stated explicitly by courts adjudicating sex-based claims of persecution by women. (2) However, the anxieties would appear to have little rational basis, as there is a ceiling on the number of asylum petitions that may be granted, and that ceiling is usually not reached. (3) Although we grasp the policy concerns voiced by proponents of traditional interpretations of asylum policy that categorize endemic sex-based violence as matters of culture or private action and thus beyond the scope of policy, we argue that such an approach reinforces masculinist norms and privileges the suffering of male refugees over that of their female counterparts. To unmask the male norms embedded in U.S. asylum policy and to bring a feminist perspective to bear on the ways in which the policy exacerbates existing gendered inequities, we trace the experiences of female refugees from the escape to adjudication. By carefully examining the impact of policies, from indefinite detention prior to hearings to establishing a credible fear of persecution in the eyes of judges who regard nervousness or inconsistency as signs of dishonesty (rather than as symptoms of post-traumatic stress) to the actual decisions, we illustrate the ways in which standards derived from male experiences are applied to women, almost always to their disadvantage. While promising developments have occurred, particularly with regard to women fleeing the practice of genital mutilation (FGM), those developments occur in incremental fashion and continue to be the exception rather than the norm.

To elucidate the effect of policies upon the individual lives, we adopt a feminist methodological approach. An aggregated approach that simply examines general patterns and attempts to adapt existing policy to women's experiences is inherently flawed, in that it assumes the validity of existing policies usually based on male experiences. In effect, to struggle to apply policies incorporating male norms to women and their experiences is to protect patriarchal privilege. (4) By contrast, grounding our research in the lived experience of women refugees and asylum-seekers allows us to identify and deconstruct the norms that exclude them from relief. Thus, in this work, we engage the standpoint theory approach, an approach that recognizes the distinctive features of women's situations within the context of a gender-stratified society.

Unlike conventional empirical research, standpoint theory begins with the experiences of those who do not belong to the dominant group and adopts the "standpoint" of the marginalized. It recognizes that all principles and policies are informed by the perspective of those who develop and enforce them and that purportedly objective standards embody and reflect a particular set of norms. It is the dominant group's interests and values that create a framework not only for political relationships, but also for the study of those relationships. (5) To avoid adopting the perspective of the politically powerful, which by definition excludes those petitioning for asylum on gendered grounds, we must shift our analysis and examine the laws, policies, and practices of the asylum process from the refugees perspective.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Positioning Women's Rights within Asylum Policy: A Feminist Analysis of Political Persecution
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?