Factors Influencing the Contrast between Men's and Women's Speech

By Yaeger-Dror, Malcah | Women and Language, Spring 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Factors Influencing the Contrast between Men's and Women's Speech

Yaeger-Dror, Malcah, Women and Language

It has been demonstrated by sociolinguists that women and men do not speak alike. In fact, even in the analysis of dialect variation, where the focus is on women (or men) as innovators, different linguists have radically different opinions, buttressed, it would appear, by incontrovertible evidence. The present paper will suggest that the naivete of linguists has influenced the research designs which permit the collection of data on which these analyses of language variation were made; it will propose methods for collecting data which will reveal more clearly the language-gender connection, without confusion induced by the Observer's Paradox (Labov 1972), the tendency for the interviewees' speech habits and reports of speech habits to be influenced by the mere fact that they are being observed by an outsider.

The paper will suggest that controlling for sex composition of interviewer-interviewee dyads in studies of linguistic change is relevant to all levels of communicative behavior. Until we design our studies to compare linguistic practices by the sex composition of the interacting dyad - especially among age similar pairs - it is premature to speculate about sex differences in language change. The paper provides examples of studies that have confounded the cross-gender influence on language choice with the influence of interviewee sex alone, and discusses the implications for language change studies, and for our understanding of convergence and divergence. The paper suggests three methods which can be used to control for this problem: The researcher can use homogeneous pairs, can use naturalistic observation, or systematic comparisons by dyadic sex differences. Hopefully this discussion will not only sensitize researchers to the potential shortcomings of the research designs in common use [and the dangers of drawing conclusions from studies based on such research], but will provide more adequate possible designs.

Review of the literature

Principle I: Women as rearguard guerrillas

Many British linguists portray women as providing a conservative/retrograde influence in changes which are assumed to be conscious, or 'from above [the level of awareness]' (Trudgill 1972, 1983; Wardhaugh 1991:[section]8).(1) In fact, women are reported to be fighting this rearguard action, using standard forms, even when linguistic changes are completed. Labov (1990) refers to this as Principle I of the sexual differentiation of sound change.

For example,

* The linguistic variable -ing - or (ing), with parentheses denoting it as a sociolinguistic variable - is known to be fairly stable in English, since the variation between -ing and -in' has been attested for centuries, without the change having become categorical. The 'blame' for retention of - ing is placed on women and the Upper Middle Class (Trudgill 1972, Chambers 1995).

* Wolfram's (1969) interviews with Afro-Americans in Detroit also revealed that women favored Standard forms more than men: men used more negative concord [can't get no satisfaction], [f] for (q) as in [wIf] for with, and copula deletion [He . . . ready.] than women.

* Trudgill (1972) and Chambers and Trudgill (1980) found that in both England and Norway women report themselves as speaking even more Standard than they actually do, while men report themselves as using more vernacular pronunciation.

Different explanations have been given for this contrasting behavior of men and women. Trudgill (1983:[section]9) theorized that men have economic sources of prestige, while women tap into the prestige of a higher economic group, using language as a status display. Alternatively, he suggests that women adapt themselves to more standard usage for interacting with children. Either of these hypotheses addresses the apparent fact that women limit vernacular change by using older - 'Standard' - forms.

However, other hypotheses have been proposed which permit other conclusions:

* Like Trudgill, Cheshire (1982) found that Reading lower working class preteens and teenaged girls also use much more Standard syntax than the boys.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Factors Influencing the Contrast between Men's and Women's Speech


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?