Dounreay's Nuclear Smokescreen

By Riddoch, Lesley | New Statesman (1996), May 22, 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Dounreay's Nuclear Smokescreen


Riddoch, Lesley, New Statesman (1996)


Lesley Riddoch asks why Georgia's spent fuel ended up at a plant that cannot handle it

Strange how a couple of unexpected events can ruin a perfectly good policy. Thanks to Sierra Leone, and now Indonesia, the "ethical foreign policy" that sounded so admirable now looks dead. Thanks to India and Pakistan the aspiration of nuclear non-proliferation looks shaky. And thanks to Dounreay Tony Blair and Robin Cook's high-minded masterplan to remove dangerous uranium from the hands of Soviet terrorists is looking like a naive blunder.

It's not simply that the site judged safe enough to store, process and reprocess the Georgian nuclear fuel has since been closed on safety grounds by the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII), though that's embarrassing enough. Nor is it just that government ministers announced plans to reprocess the 0.8kg of spent fuel in the Georgian consignment regardless of the fact that Dounreay has been unable to reprocess anything for the past 18 months.

It's primarily because ministers, opposition politicians and even august organs such as this magazine failed to see through the emotional smokescreen of the gallant Soviet rescue mission.

Few people disagreed about the need to move the 5.1kg of highly enriched uranium from war-torn Tblisi. But even fewer seemed concerned about what happened to it afterwards. All of which played neatly into the hands of a Dounreay management team intent on reentering the business of nuclear reprocessing; a business the people of Caithness voted to halt three years ago, and a business the NII believes Dounreay is not currently equipped to handle.

In short it seems that Dounreay, the UK Atomic Energy Authority and its parent body, the Department of Trade and Industry, may have regarded the Georgian fuel as providing an opportunity to buy the necessary kit and receive the necessary safety consents to begin reprocessing again, despite public and professional misgivings.

So what actually happened? Was Tony Blair misled about Dounreay's safety record? Or did the heat of the moral crusade and the chance for another moment on the world stage blot out the logistical difficulties?

One thing is for sure: the timing of Georgian fuel deal was brilliantly ironic. As news broke from the US that Tony and Bill had brokered the humanitarian rescue of vulnerable uranium fuel supplies, a meeting was taking place at Dounreay between the NII, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) and Dounreay management.

They had a lot to discuss. One reprocessing plant, codenamed D1206, wasn't working. The other, older D1204 had been idle from lack of work, and the Nil had already told Dounreay it would have to make a fresh safety case before it could reopen.

Campaigners believe the inspectors feared that with so many repairs, replacements and new bits of "kit" over the years, Dounreay management had been left with a hotchpotch of equipment that it might not even be able to list, let alone control.

So on the morning it was announced that the Georgian fuel was on its way, there was nowhere at Dounreay permitted to reprocess. Far worse, the Nil inspectors were on the site to deliver their quarterly report, in which they prohibited Dounreay from receiving any spent fuel on to the site, for storage or reprocessing.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Dounreay's Nuclear Smokescreen
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?