Do Status Differences among Workers Make a Difference during Economic Crises? the Case of Depression Hamilton

By Archibald, W. Peter | The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, May 1998 | Go to article overview

Do Status Differences among Workers Make a Difference during Economic Crises? the Case of Depression Hamilton


Archibald, W. Peter, The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology


The present analysis is part of a larger study of Hamilton workers during the Great Depression of the 1930s. Because approximately 70% of Hamilton's local economy centred around the making of iron and steel and various capital and consumer goods from them, it was particularly damaged by the crisis. Rates of "short time" and unemployment among construction workers, "unskilled labourers" in general, and all categories of workers compared unfavorably with most other Canadian cities, as did the proportions of working-class individuals and families on public relief (Archibald, 1992). Furthermore, when 100 men and 100 women who had lived and worked for pay in Hamilton for at least two years between 1929 and 1939 were asked whether the Depression had made their lives "much worse" (see Archibald, 1996a), a majority (56.1%) replied that it had.

Nevertheless, deprivation among workers was not uniform. There were large differences among industries. Workers employed in the textile and clothing and domestic service as well as public service industries were much less affected than those in construction and the manufacture of iron and steel products. However, there were also large differences within industries. Thus, "skilled," "craft" workers and those with higher pay and occupational status more generally often lost less time than "unskilled" and lower-paid and lower-status workers, yet this was not always true. Indeed, craftsmen in construction lost so much time that many left the industry for much lower-paid, but also more secure employment as maintenance workers in factories.

Similarly, older and middle-aged workers who had entered the labour market and obtained full-time jobs well before the onset of the Depression seemed to fare better than younger workers, yet there were also reports in the literature that because there was no minimum wage for male factory workers in Ontario, some employers were giving more work to younger and cheaper workers. As was true more generally, women workers in Hamilton suffered less short time and unemployment than men did, but it is not clear whether this was a result of employers preferring women because their labour was cheaper, or simply of women having been concentrated in industries and occupations which were shielded from the crisis (Dominion Bureau of Statistics, 1938: 172-73; Weaver, 1982: 131; Horn, 1984: 11).

Finally, statistics for Ontario in general indicate that on average, workers of British ancestry lost less time than did those whose origins were from central and southern Europe (Dominion Bureau of Statistics, 1937: 276). Oral historians (e.g., Broadfoot, 1975: Chapters 14 and 26), claim that prejudice and discrimination against workers from minority racial and ethnic groups greatly increased during the 1930s. Among the workers we interviewed, even a majority of white workers of British ethnicity agreed that this was the case, yet quite a few workers of other races and ethnicities claimed that they had not suffered from discrimination. Some of the latter were employed in industries and occupations buffered from the Depression, but some even claimed that their peasant origins and traditional food and recreational preferences gave them an advantage over majority workers. We also suspected that some employers may have preferred to hire minorities as well as women, because they were also cheaper to employ.

These inconsistencies seemed to warrant further research.

The literature provides numerous predictions for the effects of status differences during economic crises. Rubery et al. (1988: 3, 15) delineate three popular hypotheses: 1) "recession opens up new opportunities for women workers as employers, pressed to cut costs and increase the flexibility of production, substitute women for men within their workforces;" 2) "women are a flexible reserve, to be drawn into the labor market in upturns and expelled in downturns;" and 3) "According to the job segregation hypothesis, there is rigid sex-typing of occupations[;] hence demand for female labour is dependent on demand in female-dominated sectors; employment trends will thus be related more to secular trends in sectoral and occupational structures than to cyclical factors"(emphases added). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Do Status Differences among Workers Make a Difference during Economic Crises? the Case of Depression Hamilton
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.