Temporal Causality and the Dynamic Interactions among Marketing Activity within a Multivariate Cointegrated System

By Ramos, Francisco F. R. | Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, July 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Temporal Causality and the Dynamic Interactions among Marketing Activity within a Multivariate Cointegrated System


Ramos, Francisco F. R., Academy of Marketing Studies Journal


INTRODUCTION

Basically, two approaches have been used in the past to estimate the relationship among sales (demand) and marketing-mix variables at various levels of aggregation. Most commonly, a regression model is estimated which includes e.g., advertising expenditure (or a proxy) among its explanatory variables and appropriate dynamics. The list of such studies is rather long; only Clarke (1976) reviews 69 of them. The second, and more recent, approach is to estimate a Box-Jenkins time series model as was done by Helmer and Johansson (1977), Hanssens (1980), Bhattacharyya (1982), and Heyse and Wei (1985).

The direction of causality is usually assumed to run from advertising to sales whereas the possibility of an effect of sales on advertising, whereby advertising budgets are set as a percentage of sales, although recognized (Schmalensee, 1972), it has received much less attention. Ashley et al. (1980) and Heyse and Wei (1985) present evidence supporting causality from consumption (sales) to advertising rather than the reverse.

The causal chain (among sales and other marketing activity such as advertising, price, and promotions) implied by the existing marketing paradigms still remains ambiguous. The issue, therefore, as to the dynamic causal relationships (even in the Granger temporal sense rather than in the structural sense) remains unresolved and is an empirical one (1).

In order to empirically resolve the issue of the direction of causation in a bivariate context, a lot of causality tests have been applied based mainly on the standard Granger (1969), Sims (1972), and the modified Sims suggested by Geweke et al. (1983). But the studies applying these tests suffered from the following methodological deficiencies:

(i) These standard tests did not examine the basic time series properties of the variables. If the variables are cointegrated, then these tests incorporating different variables will be misspecified unless the lagged error-correction term is included (Granger 1988).

(ii) These tests turn the series stationary mechanically by differencing the variables and consequently eliminated the long-run information embodied in the original level form of the variables. The error-correction model (ECM) derived from the cointegrating equations, by including the lagged error-correction term reintroduces, in a statistically acceptable way, the long-run information lost through differencing. The error-correction term (ECTs) stands for the short-run adjustment to long-term equilibrium trends. This term also opens up an additional channel of Granger causality so far ignored by the standard causality tests.

(iii) Moreover, although recently, there has been a beginning of the application of ECM in causality testing in the bivariate context, such as Baghestani (1991), Chowdhury (1994), Dekimpe and Hanssens (1995), Jung and Seldon (1995), Lee, Shin and Chung (1996), and Zanias (1994), there has been very little attempt at testing the Granger causality channel in a dynamic multivariate Marketing context through vector error-correction modelling (VECM), variance decompositions (VDC) and impulse response functions (IRF).

The primary purpose of this research is to conduct empirical tests to discern the dynamic causal relationships (in the Granger (temporal) sense rather than in the structural sense) among sales and other marketing-mix variables such as total advertising expenditures, and price in the context of the Portuguese car market.

As mentioned before, at the moment a very few works (only about three or four) exist on the application of ECM in testing Granger causality. But even these few works are set in a bivariate context, and also do not apply the techniques of variance decompositions and impulse response functions to Granger causality. This study will make an attempt to improve and extend the existing few ECM-based works on Granger causality in the following ways:

(a) It will try to discern Granger causality in a car market in a multivariate framework and within the environment of vector error-correction modelling.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Temporal Causality and the Dynamic Interactions among Marketing Activity within a Multivariate Cointegrated System
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?