A Tale of Two Offerings

By Sloan, Allan; Thomas, Rich | Newsweek, July 13, 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

A Tale of Two Offerings


Sloan, Allan, Thomas, Rich, Newsweek


SLOAN is NEWSWEEK'S Wall Street editor. His e-mail address is sloan@panix.com.

Fox and the government's uranium plants are both selling stock. Which one's the better deal?

OK, FANS, THE FOURTH OF JULY HAS just passed and some of us still have 33 our minds in holiday mode. So instead of dealing with complex stuff, let's have a simple quiz. The question: what do Rupert Murdoch's Fox entertainment empire and the federal government's uranium-enrichment plants have in common? No, the answer isn't that both sometimes produce toxic waste. And the answer doesn't involve Homer Simpson, the Fox cartoon character who works at a nuclear plant powered by uranium. Give up? OK Fox and the U.S. Enrichment Corp. both announced plans last week to sell stock to investors in initial public offerings.

When you see the market-savvy Murdoch and the usually clueless Uncle Sam doing the same thing at the same time, you have a great chance to compare and contrast, as they put it in the essay portion of your high-school English exam.

For starters, you can see Murdoch is by far the shrewder about markets. He's giving Wall Street what it likes-an entertainment "pure play"- while the government is peddling what the market doesn't want: a low-growth vendor to the nuclear power industry, a slow-growth or no-growth market. But the sexier investment isn't necessarily the better one.

Let me explain. Murdoch is making Fox a separate company to highlight its value and thus boost the share price of its owner, News Corp. Fox will include the Fox TV stations, network, movie studio, programming interests and sports teams. Murdoch will sell a 20 percent stake in the new company which experts value at $15 billion to $20 billion as a whole. You can be sure that when Fox documents are filed at the Securities and Exchange Commission, we'll see that the proposed price is a stratospheric multiple of Fox's profits. And if there's a cash dividend, it will be microscopic. Who bothers with boring things like profits and dividends when you can buy into concepts like "content" and "branding"?

By contrast, the U.S. Enrichment Corp.-a federal corporation whose "privatization" has been inching along since the Reagan administration- doesn't seem to have a clue how to make itself look sexy to investors. For starters, you would think the name "Enrichment" would stay in the company's name, if only because enrichment is what stock buyers dream of.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

A Tale of Two Offerings
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?