In Search of Hindsgavl: Experiments in the Production of Neolithic Danish Flint Daggers

By ord, Michael | Antiquity, June 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

In Search of Hindsgavl: Experiments in the Production of Neolithic Danish Flint Daggers

ord, Michael, Antiquity

This study presents a project which explored the complex production technology of Danish flint daggers of the 'Hindsgavl' type. Whereas the chronology and variation in the Late Neolithic flint dagger sequence are widely understood, the complex lithic technology used to create flint daggers is relatively unexplored. This paper discusses the technology of the most complex and arguably most spectacular of the dagger forms, the type IVe dagger of the 'Hindsgavl' or stitched type (Lomborg 1973).

The main thrust of this article is the importance of innovation to the development of flint dagger technology. Although technological precursors to dagger production were present as far back as the Early Neolithic, unique technological innovations were necessary for the successful production of certain dagger forms. Driven by social and economic demands, these precursors and innovations coalesced in Denmark during the Late Neolithic to produce what are likely the most technologically complex chipped-stone tools found anywhere in the world during prehistory.

The chronological and typological scheme

The first flint daggers in Denmark appeared during the Late Neolithic, at the juncture of the Single Grave and Bell Beaker cultures. Dagger production extended into the Early Bronze Age, ending shortly after 1600 BC. Work by Lomborg (1973a) and more recently by Rasmussen (1990) has effectively illustrated the variation in dagger forms and their associated temporal relationships. Lomborg identified six distinct dagger forms, all having chronological and/or geographical significance [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 1 OMITTED].

The emergence of flint dagger production in south Scandinavia is considered to be in response to an influx of metal daggers from central Europe near the close of the 3rd millennium BC. West European Bell Beaker copper daggers are generally considered inspirational templates, both stylistically and ideologically, for the production of Danish flint daggers (see Bronsted 1960: 322-3 for several comparative samples; [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 2 OMITTED]). Evidence for a prestige-based social structure among Denmark's west European neighbours offers a parallel to the emerging differentiated social systems in many areas of Denmark near the end of the Neolithic. The fact that imported metal daggers were copied in flint on such a large scale in such a short period is testament indeed to the significance of novel foreign metal goods in Late Neolithic Danish culture (Vandkilde 1993: 147).

Flint daggers have been recovered from a variety of contexts in Scandinavia, including votive caches, grave offerings, settlements and, most frequently, as unassociated stray finds. Although flint daggers are known from all areas of Denmark, the highest concentration is found west of the Great Belt, particularly in northern Jutland. This concentration, particularly in regard to early lanceolate forms, probably reflects specialized dagger production centred around large-scale flint mining at places like Bjerre, near Limfjorden (see Becker 1993). The availability of good quality flint in considerable size made these areas ideal for a craft industry which eventually saw Danish flint daggers travel as far north as Norway (Ebbesen 1993:125).

Beyond the presence of generous flint resources, a rapid population expansion in northern Jutland, particularly in Thy, led to the establishment of a dense population base by the Early Bronze Age (Jensen 1993:133). Thus, while it is likely resource availability was a key component to the establishment of dagger production centres, so too was a growing population base of eager consumers. Intense economic demand coupled with virtually limitless raw material may help explain the rapid development of such a complex technology.

Many dagger types have sub-variants based on outline form, although the significance of this remains somewhat unclear. Some inter-type variation probably reflects differential resharpening intensities or use (the so-called 'Frison effect'; Jelinek 1976: 21), but topologically based distribution differences for some sub-types may reflect group-based style zones within individual dagger forms.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

In Search of Hindsgavl: Experiments in the Production of Neolithic Danish Flint Daggers


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?