Institutions Matter: Great (and Not So Great) Transformations and Their Macroeconomic Consequences

By Zalewski, David A. | Journal of Economic Issues, June 1998 | Go to article overview

Institutions Matter: Great (and Not So Great) Transformations and Their Macroeconomic Consequences


Zalewski, David A., Journal of Economic Issues


As the next millennium approaches, global economic institutions increasingly resemble those that characterized the laissez-faire era of a century ago. Most representative of this transformation is the return to a self-regulating market system, as countries open their borders to unfettered trade while slashing social welfare programs to become more competitive.

Perhaps the most controversial response to increasing globalization is the European initiative to create a more comprehensive economic and political union. The culmination of this effort is the European Monetary Union (EMU), which will replace national currencies with the euro by January 2002. Advocates of this program argue that the use of a single currency will stimulate trade and capital flows by eliminating exchange rate risk among EMU members and by lowering transactions costs, enabling Europe to become an economic power that will rival the United States and Japan.

Until recently, much of the discussion on European monetary unification focused on whether enough countries would meet the budgetary and financial requirements to proceed with the first stage of implementation in 1999.(1) By October 1997, however, significant progress by several nations in meeting the convergence criteria and a promise by officials to be flexible when selecting the "first wave" participants by mid-1998 almost guarantees the transformation will take place as scheduled.(2)

Because of these developments, policymakers must now consider whether the agreement should be modified to increase the likelihood of the regime's success. By considering monetary unification in a social and political context suggested by Karl Polanyi [1957], this paper recommends that a federal fiscal authority be established to address labor and social welfare issues. The reason for this proposal is an anticipated shift of uncertainty from capital to labor that may accompany currency unification. Although firms possess the means to manage exchange rate uncertainty, the requirements for membership in the EMU will leave policymakers with few options to address labor s insecurity.(3) Consequently, the current strategy for monetary union is misguided since it will lead to what Polanyi [1957, 132] described as the double movement, in which voters will pressure policymakers to adopt protective mechanisms in response to a further expansion of the self-regulated market. Unless European leaders can effectively respond to this uncertainty and obtain labor's support for the euro, increasing agitation for political solutions will undermine the credibility of the regime and eventually lead to its collapse.(4)

Monetary Unification, Efficiency, and Growth

Despite their inability to coordinate economic policies as required by the European Monetary System, members of the European Union (EU) committed themselves to monetary integration by signing the Maastricht Treaty in December 1991. The provisions of this agreement call for fixing exchange rates and delegating the responsibility for monetary policy to the European Central Bank (ECB) by January 1, 1999, and replacing national currencies with the euro by January 2002. To be eligible for membership, countries must achieve convergence on government budget deficits, inflation, and exchange rates.(5) Currently, only Luxembourg meets the criteria spelled out in the Agreement.(6)

EMU supporters argue for monetary unification on both practical and theoretical grounds. European business leaders predict that the use of a single currency will enable them to increase their exports to other EU countries by lowering transactions costs and eliminating exchange rate risk. Politicians expect the euro will help further economic and political integration, which will prevent economic domination by other nations. Moreover, classical economic theory contends that inappropriate currency values distort prices and limit the realization of gains from specialization and exchange.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Institutions Matter: Great (and Not So Great) Transformations and Their Macroeconomic Consequences
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.