The Impact of Culture on African Coup D'etat, 1960-1997

By Henderson, Errol A. | World Affairs, Summer 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Impact of Culture on African Coup D'etat, 1960-1997


Henderson, Errol A., World Affairs


It is often assumed that cultural variables are at the heart of intrastate violence in Africa. This widespread belief is accentuated by recent conflicts in Rwanda, Burundi, and Liberia where interethnic antagonisms have fueled coups d'etat, massacres, civil wars, and even genocide. Some scholars assert that states with high levels of ethnic homogeneity, ceteris paribus, are more likely to experience coups (Jackman 1978, Lunde 1991), while others insist that political and economic factors are more important (Johnson, Slater, and McGowan 1984). In this article, I assess the relative impact of cultural, economic, and political factors on the frequency of coups d'etat in Africa for the period 1960-97, nesting the study in the broader analysis of intrastate conflict in that continent. In the first section, I outline the role of cultural variables in the process of state building, nation building, and economic development. Following that, I review the literature on the correlates of African coups and then conduct an empirical analysis to determine the capacity of the relevant factors to account for the incidence of coups. I then briefly discuss the findings and their implications for further study. However, because culture is afforded such a prominent place in studies of conflict in Africa, I will begin by briefly discussing the manner by which it often violently fuses with politics and economics within African states.

THE IMPACT OF CULTURAL VARIABLES IN INSTABILITY

It is widely assumed that conflict in postwar Africa is largely a function of rifts between culturally dissimilar groups arbitrarily bound together in single juridical entities--postcolonial territorial states. The process of decolonization in Africa witnessed the creation of more independent states than in any other continent over the postwar period. Elites in these juridical states have great difficulty consolidating a truly "national" consensus, due largely, it is assumed, to the competing culture-based groups within their domain. Historically, attempts to consolidate groups under one central government have been associated with increased levels of violence (Tilly 1975; Cohen, Brown, and Organski 1981; Maoz 1989). New states in Africa often faced the challenge not only of building the institutional apparatus of the state, but of simultaneously constructing a national identity among disparate cultural groups (with exceptions such as ethnically homogeneous Somalia). Often, most of these states had not established sufficient institutional bases, such as effective political parties and efficient state bureaucracies, to successfully coordinate the mobilized interests of their populations. In such poorly institutionalized states, culture is often the primary criterion for political association.

In Africa, political parties can become the breeding ground for intercultural conflict, as the political enterprise becomes a competition among cultural interest groups. This competition puts added pressure on elites within fragile political unions. Within culturally plural societies, the pressures are often exacerbated by group leaders whose mobilization of support centers on appeals to "identity issues" and "communal interests." As cultural boundaries begin to reflect and define political participation, fissures in the fragile state system fracture, and unless more integrative institutions of the state exert a countervailing pressure, the result is too often intercultural conflict that may spawn coups d'etat, secession, irredentism, or civil war.

The mutually violent processes of state building and nation building are even further complicated by the requirements of economic development. Economic growth provides an important resin for the political and cultural aspects of development. Empirical studies have linked cultural variables with economic growth in developing states (Glahe and Vorhies 1989, Abrams and Lewis 1995); however, economic development, which appears to reduce violence in the long term, can exacerbate tensions in the short term.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Impact of Culture on African Coup D'etat, 1960-1997
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?