In M&A Accounting, Poolings Have Poor Track Record Boosting Income
Elstein, Aaron, American Banker
Companies using the merger accounting method adopted in many recent bank deals have been turning out subpar returns for shareholders, a study indicates.
In a review of U.S. bank and nonbank mergers worth more than $1 billion, a New York-based management consulting firm found that companies accounting for their deals as poolings of interest failed to beat similar companies' performance 78% of the time.
But companies that accounted for their acquisitions as purchases outperformed their peers 52% of the time during the three-year period examined, Mitchell Madison Group found.
Banks and other companies have turned to the pooling method in part because it is easier to ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: In M&A Accounting, Poolings Have Poor Track Record Boosting Income.
Contributors: Elstein, Aaron - Author.
Magazine title: American Banker.
Volume: 163.
Issue: 144
Publication date: July 30, 1998.
Page number: 1.
© 2009 SourceMedia, Inc.
COPYRIGHT 1998 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset