Rael V. Taylor and the Colorado Constitution: How Human Rights Law Ensures Constitutional Protection in the Private Sphere

By Howland, Todd | Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, Fall 1997 | Go to article overview

Rael V. Taylor and the Colorado Constitution: How Human Rights Law Ensures Constitutional Protection in the Private Sphere


Howland, Todd, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy


I. INTRODUCTION

Many Practitioners and scholars in the United States have adopted the position that the ratification of human rights treaties adds little or nothing to the protection of rights in America.(1) This is due to a perceived advanced state of constitutional rights protection.(2) However, most international human rights advocates have lamented the apparent lack of impact that the ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [ICCPR] has had on U.S. jurisprudence. They blame this on the many reservations, understandings, and declarations attached during its ratification by the Senate.(3)

The impact of the ratification has yet to be fully understood as an extremely important interpretive device for federal and state constitutions.(4) One such area is the vertical and horizontal character of human rights, which means human rights law will have an important evolutionary impact on the application of constitutional rights, not only in the public, but also in the private sphere.(5)

This article will show the vital role the ICCPR should play in resolving a case pending in the Colorado courts since 1981, involving the descendants of the original Mexican settlers to Southern Colorado and their struggle to regain land rights with a 150 year history. The ratification of the ICCPR should profoundly alter the traditional "state action" limitation in cases seeking to vindicate constitutionally protected rights. The ICCPR should form the constitutional arguments made in the case of Rael et al. v. Taylor.(6)

The ICCPR was originally drafted as a blueprint for a society where human rights are respected by all. The effect on traditional constitutional analysis is the creation of a transparent method for the examination of all rights involved and the value judgments underlying them. This is true even when the alleged violator has traditionally been considered a private actor and therefore free from scrutiny.(7)

This article will provide a short history of Rael v. Taylor; outline the constitutional analysis of the case prior to the ICCPR; discuss the ratification of the ICCPR and its meaning; and conclude with a constitutional analysis of the Rael case in light of the ICCPR's ratification.

II. THE HISTORY OF RAEL V. TAYLOR

In 1844, what is now Costilla County, Colorado, was Mexican territory including the land presently in contention in the Rael v. Taylor case.(8) That year the Mexican government issued to Narcisco Beaubien and Stephen Luis Lee the Sangre de Cristo land grant on the condition they encourage settlement in that area.(9) As was the custom at that time, Mexican law granted the businessmen a portion of the land with the remainder to be divided among the successful homesteaders and common areas.(10) These common areas would be used as pastures and a mountain tract for hunting, fishing, wood gathering and as a water supply. The land used for these common areas was held by the community with usufructuary rights to all settlers, however, title to the land reserved for common use was most often held by the local government or community but it could be held by the federal government or by an individual.(11)

In the early 1800's, Mexico and the United States were competing to expand into what is now the Southwestern part of the United States.(12) The Mexican government used attractive incentives to persuade settlers into this area.(13) It allowed title to be recognized without being formalized until after the land had already been settled. Even without formalized title, the general pattern of settlement was well known and systematically followed.(14) This made custom an extremely important part of Mexican land law during this period of rapid expansion.(15)

The original grantees, Narcisco Beaubien and Stephen Luis Lee, were killed in 1847 during the Taos Rebellion.(16) Narcisco's father, Carlos Beaubien, inherited his son's undivided one-half interest in the property and purchased the remaining interest from Lee's estate. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Rael V. Taylor and the Colorado Constitution: How Human Rights Law Ensures Constitutional Protection in the Private Sphere
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.