Justice and the Convention on Biological Diversity

By Schroeder, Doris; Pogge, Thomas | Ethics & International Affairs, Fall 2009 | Go to article overview

Justice and the Convention on Biological Diversity


Schroeder, Doris, Pogge, Thomas, Ethics & International Affairs


"Benefit-sharing" is a technical term that was popularized by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), which was adopted at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. This global convention aims to achieve three objectives: the conservation of biological diversity, the sustainable use of its components, and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits from the use of genetic resources. (1) The CBD, with 191 state parties as of spring 2009, was the first international treaty to recognize that the conservation of biodiversity is a "common concern of humankind." (2) Parties to the convention have pledged to cooperate to stop the destruction of biodiversity by attempting to ensure its sustainable use, and by requiring users of this natural wealth to share the benefits with those who provide access to nonhuman biological resources.

This paper situates the CBD within long-standing debates on justice, and asks: (a) What type of justice does the CBD demand with its principles? and (b) Can the CBD be regarded as just (or equitable) legislation? First, we explain that nonhuman biological resources can be viewed both as the common heritage of humankind and as property falling under the sovereignty of states, groups, or individuals. Second, we discuss whether the CBD is based on natural rights or alternative foundations. Third, we outline the difference between distributive justice and justice-in-exchange. Finally, we present our answers to the two questions posited above.

COMMON HERITAGE OF HUMANKIND VS. NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY

Who legally owns biological resources? For individual biological specimens, such as particular trees or even whole forests, ownership follows the usual rules. Depending on the legal system and history of the relevant country, most nonhuman biological resources are owned by private individuals, companies, traditional communities with secure rights over their ancestral land, or the state. Some general characteristics of biological species, by contrast, are considered to belong to humanity at large. These characteristics prominently include plant DNA.

The idea of the common heritage of humankind explicitly entered the canon of international law in the late twentieth century with the conclusion of two UN-brokered international treaties: the Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (1979) and the Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982). These treaties declare that the seabed, the ocean floor, the subsoil thereof, as well as the surface and the subsurface of the moon shall not become the property of any state, organization, or individual. The common heritage idea has since been extended to certain biological resources, such as human DNA, which are not governed by property ascriptions, (3) and in 1995 were (along with human body parts) specifically excluded from the CBD. (4)

But what does the common heritage principle mean? There are two conflicting interpretations, exemplified respectively in the initial text (1982) and subsequent revision (1994) of the Convention on the Law of the Sea. (5) One interpretation is that our common human heritage must be used and enjoyed on terms that benefit all. The other is that our common heritage is available to be used and exploited at will on a first-come, first-served basis.

The former interpretation is suggested by some of the more lofty language of the UN agreements and also expressed by the Human Genome Project's Ethics Committee in its Statement on Benefit Sharing (2000), which asserts that "the human genome is part of the common heritage of humanity" and "[t] herefore, the Human Genome Project should benefit all humanity." (6) But the legal and practical realities are often much closer to the latter interpretation, as has been observed by (among others) the prominent Indian environmentalist Vandana Shiva:

   The North has always used Third World germplasm as a freely
   available resource and treated it as valueless. … 

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Justice and the Convention on Biological Diversity
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.