The Theology of Conservative Judaism

By Wolf, Arnold Jacob | Judaism: A Quarterly Journal of Jewish Life and Thought, Spring 1998 | Go to article overview

The Theology of Conservative Judaism


Wolf, Arnold Jacob, Judaism: A Quarterly Journal of Jewish Life and Thought


An enormous two-volume history of the conservative movement in American Judaism, Tradition Renewed, edited by Jack Wertheimer and celebrating more than a hundred years of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, has recently appeared. It describes the school (and, implicitly, the movement centered on and directed by the Seminary) in detail and with an honesty and persuasiveness that elicit admiration. Many of the writers come from the Seminary itself, but many do not, and some have left the precincts of American Conservatism for Israel's universities or other exotic alternatives.

The power of the movement derives, in my view, from the strong leadership that it has enjoyed (unlike that of Reform or Orthodox alternatives), strong in scholarship, charisma and, at least originally, conviction. The Reform movement was fatally handicapped by an improbable theological history which begins in America with the ludicrous Pittsburgh Platform, a document of late Enlightenment hubris that surrenders all that is precious in our tradition in favor of crudely rationalist proclamations. Orthodoxy has been compromised by an obscurantist temptation that has continually, and increasingly, undermined even its brightest and most eloquent spokesmen. The two dominant American theologians of our century, both from the Seminary, Mordecai Kaplan in the first half and Abraham Joshua Heschel in the second, are matched only by the lonely voice of Joseph B. Soloveitchik in Neo-Orthodoxy and the synoptic dialectics of Eugene Borowitz in Reform Judaism. While it is, of course, true, as these annals show, that both Kaplan and Heschel were marginalized at the Seminary, they were still able to produce eloquent disciples and interpreters who have conveyed their vision to many searching American Jews who came to feel their impact, if only at second hand. In a sense, we are now all Reconstructionists in our behavior and followers of Heschel in our longing for spiritual moorings.

Another plus for Conservative Judaism was surely its placement in New York City, the heartland of Jewish ethnicity and the center of its intellectual life. While the Seminary located uptown, far from the teeming masses of Jews on the lower East Side (no accident that), so that sometimes the students had to be transported far downtown to see Zionist groups or other varieties of living Jewish self-expression, they were still close enough to breathe the atmosphere of really existing Jews. This contrasts sharply with the Rav, living isolated in Boston, or even more, with the Hebrew Union College in the once important Queen City of the West, which turned out to be a backwater, at least in Jewish history.

It is commonly said that the Seminary was created by and with the money of German Reform Jews to make sure that the new Jewish immigration would be moderate and moderately enlightened in its sudden Americanization. This tums out to be far from the whole truth, though the anomaly inhering in technical direction of the school residing in men who did not accept its theological principles or its ritual performance, remains puzzling. Whatever the Schiffs and Warburgs wanted, however (and I am not at all sure they knew exactly what they wanted), the Seminary was to be Schechter's or Adler's or Finkelstein's and not theirs. For decades, the Seminary was the whole movement, until, at last, it discovered that it could only survive by creating a more independent movement. In Reform, of course, it was the movement that created the school, and in Orthodoxy there was and is no unified movement at all.

There are some surprises in this great compendium of information and interpretation. There were more German Jews on the JTS faculty than at the Hebrew Union College. The attitude of leadership toward Zionism was equivocal, to say the least. Cyrus Adler and Louis Finkelstein were hardly in favor of political Zionism, though both learned something from the rational Jewishness of Asher Ginsberg. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Theology of Conservative Judaism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.