Clinton Edict on Federalism Stirs Up State, Local Leaders

By Shafroth, Frank | Nation's Cities Weekly, July 13, 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Clinton Edict on Federalism Stirs Up State, Local Leaders

Shafroth, Frank, Nation's Cities Weekly

A Presidential order to alter fundamentally the relationship of the federal government and state and local governments is scheduled to go into effect next month. An Executive Order on Federalism, #13083, proposed by President Clinton, would rewrite the distribution and balance of power away from the direction established under the last three Presidencies. It would set the federal government and its many agencies that affect cities and towns on a very different policy course--revoking earlier commitments to oppose unfunded federal mandates and federal preemption, and replacing them with expanded guidelines and justifications for preempting historic and traditional municipal authority.

NLC President Brian O'Neill joined the nation's governors and leaders of other national organizations in requesting delay and suspension of the implementation of the proposed new Executive Order on Federalism:

"We urge this action to provide adequate time for meaningful consultations with our levels of government with regard to proposed changes that were made with no prior consultation, notice, or warning. We believe the changes and the manner in which they were made raise serious questions with regard to your administration's perceptions of the balances of power between the three levels of government. Before revoking your previous Executive Order, or its predecessor, we urge you to negotiate revisions in consultation with leaders of the organizations of state and local elected officials.

"We make this request because we believe the new changes give an entirely different and inappropriate thrust to federalism as guidance to executive branch officials.

"Our highest priority is to halt the new trend of major federal preemption of historic and traditional state and local roles and responsibilities. The proposed executive order revokes all references to this key issue. In contrast, the new order proposes a renewed preeminence of the federal government with an emphasis on mandating uniformity. It focuses on nine reasons for this reversal of more than two decades of federal policy and deference to state and local authority.

"We believe the new Executive Order calls into question fundamental principles of federalism. We are concerned that all references to the Tenth Amendment, identification of new costs or burdens, and reduction of mandates are revoked.

"Part of the greatness of federalism has been the flexibility of our great system to allow any city, county, or state to develop new ideas and approaches to confront problems affecting Americans--the laboratory of democracy and the will of the people at each level of government in America. Unlike previous federalism Executive Orders, the new proposal, signed by President Clinton while he was in Manchester, England, would revoke both former President Reagan's Executive Order on Federalism, as well as an earlier Order by President Clinton in 1993. (For a comparison of some of the key issues for municipal leaders, see accompanying chart.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Clinton Edict on Federalism Stirs Up State, Local Leaders


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?