American Sign Language as a Pathway to Linguistic Competence

By Drasgow, Erik | Exceptional Children, Spring 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

American Sign Language as a Pathway to Linguistic Competence

Drasgow, Erik, Exceptional Children

The search for the most effective way to educate deaf students in America has a history of conflict among advocates of different approaches. For example, the period between the 1860s and the 1960s has been referred to as the "Hundred Years War" because of the enduring struggle between oral English proponents and manual signed language proponents (Lou, 1988). The conflict persists, although today it is embodied in the debate between advocates of the American Sign Language (ASL) bilingual/bicultural approach (e.g., Barnum, 1984; Drasgow, 1993; Johnson, Liddell, & Erting, 1989; Lane, Hoffmeister, & Bahan, 1996; Marmor & Petitto, 1979; Reagan, 1985) and advocates of the Manually Coded English (MCE)/Simultaneous Communication approach (e.g., Bornstein, 1982; Luetke-Stahlman, 1988a, 1988b; Maxwell & Bernstein, 1985).

This disagreement over the best approach for educating deaf students is not simply a discussion over which language or code is best to use, but rather it represents profound, and often polarized, differences in educational philosophy. That is, specific educational methods are grounded in, and driven by, the philosophy, or metatheory, one subscribes to. Metatheory refers to a way of thinking or a viewpoint about issues (Baars, 1986; Bunge & Ardila, 1987; cited in Paul & Jackson, 1993). The current conflict in deaf education, at the metatheory level, is between the clinical-pathological model (hereafter referred to as the clinical model) and the cultural model. The clinical model represents one point of view, namely, a view in which deafness is characterized as a disability stemming from a biological deficit (i.e., a lack of hearing). Thus, educational goals focus on overcoming, or compensating for, hearing loss so that students can learn to speak, read, and write English. Educational methods used to accomplish this goal include amplification, speech reading, and representing English on the hands (i.e., manually coded English).

Conversely, within the cultural model, deafness is viewed as a difference, not a disability. The conceptual framework of this model includes acknowledging that deaf people have a unique identity, with their own language, history, and social organization. From this viewpoint, deafness is a cultural, rather than biological, phenomenon. (For a complete discussion of the clinical and cultural models of deafness, see Lane, 1992 or Paul & Jackson, 1993.) Educational approaches based on this model embrace the use of ASL as the language of instruction.

The recent move towards the ASL bilingual/bicultural approach is rooted in part in the growing metatheoretical acceptance of the cultural model of deafness by both deaf and hearing individuals. The deaf community supports the cultural model because it empowers them with increased authority and responsibility to make decisions that influence the lives of deaf children and adults; likewise, the hearing community is beginning to support the model because of their increased knowledge and understanding of the value of ASL and Deaf culture (Paul & Jackson, 1993). This growing acceptance of the cultural model gains further support when it is combined with the increasing dissatisfaction with current outcomes of educational approaches based on the clinical model (e.g., the average reading level of deaf high school graduates is around 3rd or 4th grade level; Allen, 1986). Thus, the ASL approach does indeed have intuitive appeal for the cultural model advocates. But intuitive appeal alone does not warrant the implementation of an entirely new approach; instead, educational change, or reform, ought to be motivated by existing empirical research.

With this in mind, the purpose of this article is to present research that supports the shift to an ASL approach on empirical grounds. To do this:

* I will suggest guidelines for determining who may benefit from an ASL approach.

* I will review current theoretical perspectives on language acquisition.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

American Sign Language as a Pathway to Linguistic Competence


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?