Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Supreme Court Clarifies Harassment Claims

By: Anderson, Teresa | Security Management, August 1998 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Supreme Court Clarifies Harassment Claims


Anderson, Teresa, Security Management


Three recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions clarify employer liability in sexual harassment cases. In ruling on these issues, the justices further refined the definitions of sexual harassment, and in doing so expanded employer liability. The Court also, however, gave employers guidance regarding how to limit their liability.

In one case (Gebser et al v. Lago Vista Independent School District, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 96-1866, 1998), the Court ruled that a school district cannot be held liable for sexual harassment perpetrated by a teacher in its employ unless the district exercises direct control over the teacher, has notice of the harassment, and takes no action to correct the teacher's behavior.

Frank Waldrop was employed at Lago Vista High School (in Lago Vista, Texas) when he met a thirteen-year-old student identified in court documents as Jane Doe. Doe ended up in one of Waldrop's classes when she entered ninth grade.

In the summer of 1992, according to court documents, Waldrop visited Doe's home ostensibly to return a book. Knowing that Doe was alone, Waldrop allegedly initiated sexual contact. That summer, according to court documents, Waldrop and Doe (who was now fifteen) allegedly had numerous sexual encounters, none of which took place on school property. The situation ended in 1993, when a police officer discovered the two and arrested Waldrop.

Until this incident, school officials were reportedly unaware of Waldrop's alleged actions. The only notice given regarding Waldrop was made by parents of other children who had complained that Waldrop made inappropriate remarks in the presence of female students. The high school principal investigated these claims, which Waldrop denied, but could not prove the accusations. These complaints were not passed on to the school …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?