Electoral Reform

By Redmond Robert S. | Contemporary Review, August 1998 | Go to article overview

Electoral Reform


Redmond Robert S., Contemporary Review


Maybe the fundamentals of British Democracy - the way in which we vote - are not perfect. There have been arguments in favour of electoral reform for more than a century, but since the Reform Act of 1884 which set up the model of our present single member constituencies as they are today, we have muddled along. At least, people have understood how the system works, even if they have not approved of it.

A Speaker's Conference in 1916 recommended the adoption of the Alternative Vote or Preferential Representation and a Bill passed through the House of Commons to legislate for it. Neither of the two main political parties - Conservative or Liberal - saw any advantage in it; they felt confident of their ability to form governments on their own and it was never implemented. Now things are happening. Changes to our constitution are afoot. Yet, so far as the fundamental system of voting is concerned, few are showing the concern the issue ought to warrant.

Most of us understand there is to be a Parliament for Scotland and an Assembly for Wales. We hope for peace in Ireland with an agreement which sounds complicated. There is to be an elected Mayor for London. What seems to have escaped attention is the mix of methods for elections to be adopted.

The Mayor, we are told, will be chosen by the Alternative Vote or Preferential Representation. Our Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) are to be drawn from regional lists of party choices. The Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly will have constituency and additional members elected on something like the German system of Proportional Representation. The MEPs for Northern Ireland have always been elected by the Single Transferable Vote (a form of Proportional Representation) and the same system has been used in the Northern Ireland Assembly. There will, we are told, be five members for each of the Northern Ireland Westminster constituencies.

All this means that, so far, without serious public debate, we shall have at least four new and different electoral systems operating in the UK. On top of this, the Government has appointed a Commission under the Chairmanship of Lord Jenkins with the following terms of reference:

The Commission shall be free to consider and recommend any appropriate system or combination of systems in recommending an alternative to the present system for Parliamentary elections to be put before the people in the Government's referendum.

The Commission shall observe the requirement for local proportionality, the need for stable government, an extension of voter choice and the maintenance of a link between MPs and geographical constituencies. (Home Office Press Release 346/97 1 December 1997).

There is no suggestion in this that the Commission might be allowed to consider whether our existing 'First Past the Post' (FPP) arrangements fulfil any of the objectives laid down in these terms of reference. There are also dangers in that Roy Jenkins can hardly be regarded as a totally impartial chairman. After all, he has long advocated Proportional Representation and is a prominent member of the Liberal Democrat Party which makes no bones about its aims in that direction. This is serious. Surely such a task is for a Speaker's Conference. It is worth noting that in 1944, the then Prime Minister - Winston Churchill - saw the need for legislation on constituency boundaries and other matters and wrote to Speaker Clifton Brown: 'I am reluctant to ask you to add to your already heavy burdens by undertaking this task, but it is most important that the issues before the conference directly affecting as they do the interests of all the political parties, should be considered in as impartial a spirit as possible. The Government are sure that the best method of realising this object is by following the precedent set in 1916 and asking you to preside.'

The fact that Speaker Clifton Brown's conference found against the adoption of either Proportional or Preferential Representation is immaterial today. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Electoral Reform
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.