Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric

By Cason, Jacqueline | Argumentation and Advocacy, Fall 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric


Cason, Jacqueline, Argumentation and Advocacy


Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric. By Douglas Walton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007; pp. vii + 386. $80.00; paper $28.99.

Before the primary election of 2008, I was inundated with up to five mailings a day trying to influence my vote on citizen initiatives. In some cases, multiple mailings arrived from identical sources. Advocacy groups were using varied argument strategies, constructing multiple audiences committed to different premises, in order to persuade others. State agencies posted web sites on the same issues to inform and shape public opinion; and opinion polls were released to reveal what we were willing to commit to. All the while, 18-25 year olds were busily organizing Facebook sites to promote their own causes. Few can doubt that the volume and pace of arguments circulated through mass media channels are increasing dramatically as we move further into the 21st century, and our most recent Presidential election season underscored this fact.

In sum, the processes of decision-making in our democracy have become intimately networked. Evolving arguments, on issues civic, political, legal, and scientific, will continue to spread through mass media channels. Lacking a centralized, official source of reliable information, mass audiences will be challenged to make rational judgments, and will often need to judge incomplete and competing arguments. Will audiences fall prey to propaganda, emotional appeals, push-polling, or fallacious reasoning? Could this be the end of democracy, or perhaps the beginning of a rejuvenated deliberative democracy?

Within this networked communication environment, Douglas Walton's Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric (2007) seeks to nurture the quality of values-based practical reasoning by developing a theory and methods for identifying, analyzing, and evaluating argumentation in mass media contexts:

If deliberative democracy is to work as a useful and reasoned method of arriving at prudent conclusions on how to act under conditions of uncertainty and disagreement, the mass media audience must also learn how to use argumentation skills to deal with the information and argumentation explosion due to both traditional mass media and the Internet, by learning to judge what kind of information is reliable and what kind of persuasion is fallacious (p. 359).

Walton's work clearly extends the aspirations of The New Rhetoric Project (NRP), initiated by Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca, and participates in a commitment to rational agents who are capable of engaging in dialectical-rhetorical argumentation to make collaborative decisions. As the subtitle suggests, neither dialectic nor rhetoric alone will suffice to meet the challenges of informed argument evaluation. Like the NRP, Walton pursues a rapprochement of dialectic and rhetoric; like the NRP, he develops his method with contextualized case studies; and like the NRP, he envisions the fundamental speech act of persuasion as one that begins in agreement with premises both sides will commit to publicly. In his review of where the NRP is headed in the future, Frank described the project as a "blueprint for civil society," one that appreciates the plurality of human values and that fosters empathy in understanding the dissent of others (2004, p. 270). Walton transports that civil project into a more complex, networked media environment and places his investigation alongside new developments in artificial intelligence, which is likewise moving toward a social model of argumentation that conceives of rationality as a dialogue.

Taken as a whole, Walton's theory of mass media argumentation characterizes audience and arguer as part of a multi-agent system sharing common knowledge upon which they base their dialogues. The cognitive capacity for simulative reasoning is the answer to a persistent problem of audience that recurs throughout the book, what Walton refers to as the response-to-dialogue or RTD problem.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?