If at First You Don't Succeed, Ignore the Question Next Time? Group Harm in Brown V. Board of Education and Loving V. Virginia

By Ely, John Hart | Constitutional Commentary, Summer 1998 | Go to article overview

If at First You Don't Succeed, Ignore the Question Next Time? Group Harm in Brown V. Board of Education and Loving V. Virginia


Ely, John Hart, Constitutional Commentary


I'm guessing you don't need to be reminded that in Brown v. Board of Education,(1) decided in 1954, the Supreme Court declared segregation of the public schools by race unconstitutional. It may need recalling, however, that aside from reciting the facts and explaining why segregation hadn't been validated by history, the Court's opinion was entirely devoted to establishing the proposition that school segregation treated the races unequally, and more particularly that black children generally were harmed by it in ways that white children were not.

We come then to the question presented: Does segregation of

children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even

though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may

be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal

educational opportunities?(2)

Thirteen years later the Court in Loving v. Virginia,(3) again unanimous, and again speaking through Chief Justice Warren, invalidated state "antimiscegenation" laws precluding black and white people from marrying each other. The Loving opinion was devoted in its essential entirety to reciting the facts and explaining why such laws hadn't been validated by history. Not a word was devoted to establishing the proposition that such laws treated the races unequally.

Just a difference in emphasis, albeit a dramatic one? Actually no: further analysis of both cases renders the disparity more perplexing still. So far as Brown was concerned, the proof of general racial harm was, frankly, somewhat shaky, and apparently is even more widely so regarded today. Where did the Court get its conclusion that black children in general were harmed by school segregation? First, from the proceedings below in the Topeka case. (Brown in the Supreme Court was several cases consolidated.) In that proceeding a number of experts had indeed testified that school segregation was harmful to the ability of black children to learn. But other experts testified that desegregation, by engendering insecurity on the part of black students, would actually impede their ability to learn.(4) Nor were these opposing experts a collection of nuts and klansmen. They were academics also apparently concerned with the welfare of black children, whose credentials were comparable to those on the other side; and we know in hindsight that there was much truth in what they said as well.(5)

Beyond that, as I said, the testimony relied on was given in the Topeka case. But given that the topic the Court had set for itself was black feelings of inferiority and their likely effect on learning, it might at least have paused to inquire whether such evidence (and the Topeka district court's findings(6)) automatically translated to the consolidated cases--to Clarendon County, South Carolina, for example, with 2799 black students and 295 white students--and for that matter to the thousands of school districts across the country that technically were not involved in the litigation but would effectively be bound by the Court's mandate.

That's where the Court's controversial(7) footnote 11 came in, citing certain reports and books by psychologists that, according to the Court, "amply supported" its finding that even physically equal segregated schools had a negative impact on the ability of black children to learn. Well intended all, but unfortunately, when not simply irrelevant to the Court's point,(8) at least now the object of widespread professional criticism.(9)

And no matter what's going on there, it seems rather transparently the case that Chief Justice Warren's remarks about how segregated schools can impede the learning opportunities of black children, eloquent as they were, had little if any bearing on the per curiam orders that came down almost immediately thereafter, desegregating buses, golf courses and beaches, without any psychological buttresses of the sort that were at least attempted in Brown. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

If at First You Don't Succeed, Ignore the Question Next Time? Group Harm in Brown V. Board of Education and Loving V. Virginia
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.