Traces of Cynic Monotheism in the Early Roman Empire

By Bosman, P. R. | Acta Classica, Annual 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Traces of Cynic Monotheism in the Early Roman Empire


Bosman, P. R., Acta Classica


Introduction

Cynic philosophy's roots go back to the 4th century BC, but it experienced a revival approximately simultaneous with the dramatic rise of Christianity. The two movements had much in common, not least their shared criticism of traditional Greco-Roman religion. (1) Two fundamental forces driving early Christian rejection of popular religion were belief in the one God of Judaism and a close association of his will with the rules for righteous living. It may be asked whether anything similar can be found in the Cynicism of that era. Some sources indeed suggest that the Cynics--traditionally focussing exclusively on ethics--were prepared to link their way of life to belief in a single God who provides or communicates the principles of correct conduct to the Cynic sage. (2)

Cynicism gradually gained prominence as popular philosophy during the Roman Empire. (3) By late antiquity, some Christian authors considered the Cynics to be their closest rivals from among the philosophical schools. (4) If the claim may be accepted that monotheism was a prerequisite for the success of early Christianity, (5) one may suspect that a contemporary movement with popular appeal would also have harboured thoughts on a topic of such crucial importance. This suspicion is strengthened by the Antisthenic roots of Cynicism. (6) Antisthenes, the late 5th/early 4th century Socratic, is credited with probably the least ambiguous formulation of monotheism in all antiquity, expressed in terms of the sophistic nomos-physis antithesis. As reported by Philodemus, Antisthenes claimed in his Physics that there are many gods 'according to custom' (kata nomon), but only one 'according to nature' (kata fusin). (7)

Unfortunately, evidence from Cynic literature of the Roman era is meagre and ambiguous, as reflected in the absence of an opinio communis on the issue of Cynic religion. (8) However, indications exist of some Cynics at least who shared with the majority of ancient philosophers a belief in one God governing the universe. (9) Before we attempt to establish the outlines of such a belief and even of a rudimentary theology, the Cynicism of the first centuries of our era and their attitude towards religion must be briefly considered. Following two low-keyed centuries, Cynicism became something of a philosophical mass movement during the early imperial period. (10) By the 2nd century AD, Cynics were a common sight in imperial centres, as Dio and Lucian observe:

 
   twn de Kunikwn legomenwn esti men en th polei plhqo~ ouk oligon ... 
   outoi de en te triodoi~ kai stenwpoi~ kai pulwsin ierwn ageirousi 
   kai apatwsi paidaria kai nauta~ kai toiouton oclon ... 
 
   There is no small mob of the so-called Cynics in the city 
   (Alexandria) ... these gather at cross-roads and alleyways and 
   temple-gates, and they deceive boys and sailors and such crowds ... 
   (11) 
 
   toigaroun empeplhstai pasa poli~ th~ toiauth~ radiourgia~, kai 
   malista twn Diogevnh kai Antisqenh kai Krathta epigrafomenwn kai 
   upo; tw kuni tattomenwn ... 
 
   For this reason every city is filled with such knavery, 
   particularly with those who enlist with Diogenes, Antisthenes, and 
   Crates and are posted under the dog. (12) 

Taking into account that both these authors had Cynic sympathies, the passages reveal an apparent schism between the cultured or educated Cynics on the one hand, and the uneducated, charlatan Cynics on the other. Our sources are virtually all from the literate side of the controversy and strongly biased against the seemingly huge but voiceless group who, they claim, took to the externals of the philosophy without comprehending its intellectual core: these Cynics sported the costume, but degraded it with coarse, abusive behaviour and lack of integrity. The same authors (and others such as Seneca, Epictetus and Julian) also eulogise the early Cynics and those contemporaries they believe to be the true heirs of Diogenes, such as Demetrius and Demonax.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Traces of Cynic Monotheism in the Early Roman Empire
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?