The Rise of Limited Government
Frohnen, Bruce, The World and I
Political history in the West has largely consisted of attempts to put into action the religious principle--going back as far as Moses and the Ten Commandments--that rulers must obey the higher law. Israelite leaders, like their people, often violated the commandments and their covenant with God. But there grew up institutions--judges and prophets--to hold rulers and people to the higher law and bring them back to it when they strayed. In the Christian world, the higher law tradition grew into a fundamental separation between religion and politics. From this arose a separate church hierarchy that pronounced rules of conduct binding on rulers as well as subjects. On several occasions popes officially deposed rulers and encouraged people to rebel against them because the rulers had committed serious crimes against the higher law.
Within this millennium, religious institutions have not been alone in limiting rulers' powers. Customs developed into a set of generally accepted standards of conduct binding rulers. Local authorities resisted encroachments by central governors on their customary practices, and local associations--such as craft guilds and townships--secured charters allowing them significant autonomy. And within government itself there arose the principle of separation of powers according to which political functions must be divided so that no one man or institution can exercise them all.
THE RISE OF CUSTOMARY LAW
The Christian church in the West built a body of canon law on the basis of the Ten Commandments. Clerics developed rules putting God's law into action in particular circumstances and relationships and further limiting rulers' powers. For example, the church refused to recognize marriages not entered into voluntarily, even when the monarch or his official sought the union. Rulers were bound to respect the dignity and free will of their subjects, even when this interfered with their dynastic ambitions.
Particularly in England, over time canon law came to be integrated into the customary or common law of the land, which was developed after the Norman conquest by judges who ruled in individual cases in the light of precedent or custom, with minimal recourse to statutes; it continued to evolve through the end of the eighteenth century and into the present day. Common law consisted primarily of local customs governing disputes over property ownership, contracts, and procedures in the courts. These customs developed into more general rules that were applied by judges (often the king or local nobles) in particular cases.
One important set of rules in common law related to contracts. When one person or organization contracted with another, it was assumed that both parties knew all the contract's provisions--how many goods would exchange hands, what the price would be, and so on. If one party sought to change any of these provisions, say by telling the purchaser that he must pick up the goods rather than delivering them to his principal place …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: The Rise of Limited Government. Contributors: Frohnen, Bruce - Author. Magazine title: The World and I. Volume: 13. Issue: 10 Publication date: October 1998. Page number: 22+. © 1999 News World Communications, Inc. COPYRIGHT 1998 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.