Schools, the Workplace, and Sexual Harassment

By Slade, David C. | The World and I, October 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Schools, the Workplace, and Sexual Harassment

Slade, David C., The World and I

With the scourge of sexual harassment still prevalent in the workplace and schools, many victims are fighting back through the courts. Because the sexual harasser (or predator, in the case of molesting schoolchildren) usually has a low income, victims are beginning to go after the "deep pocket" employers, who are ultimately responsible for the workplace or school environment.

Last March the Supreme Court heard two sexual harassment cases where the victims sued not only the harasser but also the employer-a city in one case and a school district in the other (see THE WORLD & I, May 1998). In both cases, the employer had no knowledge of the ongoing sexual harassment. Can the employer nonetheless still be "vicariously" liable for the unknown acts of its supervisors?

Yes, the Court ruled in one case and no in the other. The difference between the outcomes lies in the legal framework surrounding each case. The city of Boca Raton case was brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, while the Lago Vista Independent School District case was brought under Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972. Both laws were intended to stamp out harassment and discrimination, but Congress used slightly differing terms in drafting them.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act makes it illegal to discriminate against any individual on the basis of "race, color, religion, sex, or national origin." In these Title VII cases, the Supreme Court has ruled that there are two types of sexual harassment: the "quid pro quo" type, where typically a male supervisor demands sex of a female employee in return for her job security or promotion, and the "hostile working environment," where, although an employee's job security or promotion is not threatened, the atmosphere of the working environment is so hostile or degrading that it amounts to harassment. The city of Boca Raton case is a "hostile working environment" case.

In Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, Florida, Beth Ann Faragher worked as a lifeguard. On the job, her immediate male supervisors subjected her to "uninvited and offensive touching, offensive comments and gestures," although they never threatened her job or promotions. The city did have a written sexual harassment policy but never distributed it to the lifeguards. Not knowing about the policy, Faragher reported the problem to the supervisor of her supervisors. He took no action on the complaint, however, nor did he report the complaint to any city official. Faragher eventually sued the city of Boca Raton as well as her two supervisors for violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

The Federal District Court held that the city was "vicariously" liable for the male supervisors' actions because, under "agency" principles, the city controlled the supervisory authority and overall workplace environment. On appeal, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the city was not "vicariously" liable because neither supervisor was acting within the scope of his employment when the harassment took place. Further, the city was not directly liable because it neither knew nor should have known about the harassment.

The Supreme Court reversed, rejecting the "scope of employment" reasoning of the lower appeals court for the simple reason that no job description would ever call for a supervisor to sexually harass an employee. Thus, this analysis would always result in no liability of the employer. But, in the real world, the Court goes on, sexual harassment is facilitated by the involvement of a supervisor.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Schools, the Workplace, and Sexual Harassment


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?