Dissecting Environmental Extremism: The Documentary Film Not Evil Just Wrong Explores Facts concerning Global Warming, Cap-and-Trade Legislation, and the Ramifications of Following the Green Path

By Hiserodt, Ed | The New American, November 9, 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Dissecting Environmental Extremism: The Documentary Film Not Evil Just Wrong Explores Facts concerning Global Warming, Cap-and-Trade Legislation, and the Ramifications of Following the Green Path


Hiserodt, Ed, The New American


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Ask a friend or associate, "Can you explain 'cap and trade?'" More than likely you will be astounded at what a poor grasp (if any) he or she has of the subject, even though the future of our economy and even our country hinges to a large extent on whether or not cap-and-trade legislation passes or not. Without knowledge, our citizenry will not realize this innocuous phrase "cap and trade" really means government control of an ever diminishing energy supply and the rationing that must accompany any restrictive policy implemented.

Explaining how the government plans to control energy, and the effects of that control, is just one of the points that co-producers and directors Phelim McAleer and Ann McElhinney put forth in their documentary Not Evil Just Wrong. This explanation is not given by means of graphs and charts, but by the words of a young couple who have raised their family by hard work and who can see what the Obama administration's promise to shut down coal plants (because the tax on them would be prohibitively expensive) would do not only to their family, but to their community and the nation.

Where did this rush for "cap and trade" legislation come from? It is a spin-off (actually the only goal) of the hysteria over global warming alleged by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), warming supposedly caused by the tiny human contribution of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. This alleged connection has become "fact" in the mainstream media, in liberal political rhetoric, and in academia. Yet polls show that most American voters believe that climate change is caused by natural factors; moreover, more people become skeptical every day as we see and feel temperatures on the decline. This year, for instance, meteorologists joke that winter in the upper plain states came 70 days early.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

McAleer and McElhinney show that a general trend of planetary warming has been going on since the end of the Little Ice Age some 150 years ago, proving that there is no connection between C[O.sub.2] and increasing temperature--except in that increases of C[O.sub.2] levels in the atmosphere follow temperature increases on Earth because the oceans warm and outgas C[O.sub.2]. Further, they show that the major "proof" given by global-warming alarmists of C[O.sub.2] forcing temperatures up was a farce. The proof, which was offered by the IPCC in its 2001 assessment, was a graph known as the hockey stick. The film gives the history of this graph, documenting how it was found to be a fraud that caused the IPCC to remove it in its 2007 assessment.

About the "In" Crowd

Not Evil Just Wrong provides plenty of time for environmental alarmists to explain their positions, which appear ludicrous when juxtaposed with a few basic facts. First on the list is Chief Global-warming Alarmist Al Gore, whose Inconvenient Truths was found to contain nine significant errors according to Britain's High Court.

In another example of self-condemnation, a member of Plane Truth promotes shutting down air travel because of a belief that C[O.sub.2] emissions from aircraft are going to cause the planet to become uninhabitable from skyrocketing temperatures (temperature increases that I'm sure he is sad to see are not coming about, as the Earth's temperatures have actually been decreasing during the past several years to record lows--as proven by satellite temperature readings and underwater ocean monitors). There's no word from Al Gore in the movie about stopping air travel, apparently because he continues to fly around in his private jet from one "green" function to another. Nor was there any commentary from Obama and his wife, who took separate jumbo jets to Copenhagen to lobby the International Olympic Committee to hold the 2016 Olympics in Chicago.

Many viewers (including your correspondent) were expecting the documentary to be strictly on the global-warming issue, since dialogue on that issue is in a critical phase in U.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Dissecting Environmental Extremism: The Documentary Film Not Evil Just Wrong Explores Facts concerning Global Warming, Cap-and-Trade Legislation, and the Ramifications of Following the Green Path
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?