Values and Methods in the Classroom Transformation of Oral History

By Grele, Ronald J. | The Oral History Review, Summer-Fall 1998 | Go to article overview

Values and Methods in the Classroom Transformation of Oral History


Grele, Ronald J., The Oral History Review


History offers no answers per se. It only offers a way

of encouraging men [sic] to use their minds to make

their own history.

William Appleman Williams

Despite the possibility of quite different formats and audiences, changing fashions in bibliography, differing requirements of graduate programs, and the whims of various instructors, a graduate course in oral history is, by its very nature, a course in historiography, an exploration in the nature of historical documentation. The course must, therefore, address itself to three major questions: How are such documents created? How they are interpreted. And, how they are presented. Trying to answer such questions raises, of course, all of the issues that have engaged oral historians over the past ten years: the dialectical relation between the interviewer and the interviewee and the historian and the text, problems of authority and ethics, memory and ideology, and the tension between the private and public roles of the historian.

The first problem presented by such a three-stage division of the oral history process is that it does not find a correlation in the literature of oral history. There are relatively few oral history readings which devote detailed and consistent examination to all three aspects of the issues raised, and none are so organized. Paul Thompson's The Voice of the Past, and Valerie Yow's, Recording Oral History: A Practical Guide for Social Scientists, two of the most useful basic texts for any college level oral history course, do, of course, discuss the creation of, reading of (interpretation of), and use of oral histories, but these discussions are, of necessity, broad overviews and they must, therefore, be supplemented with other readings.(1) Both Thompson and Yow devote extensive discussion to issues of interviewing and forms and arenas of presentation, but less to issues of interpretation. They are also quite different in basic thrust. The Voice of the Past gives far more extended discussion to the history of oral history, the historiographical issues involved in interviewing, and the bibliography of oral history. The Practical Guide is informed by a more complex interactive view of the interview and the document produced, and has a much more social science-oriented bibliography. My own work, Envelopes of Sound, which is sometimes used as a basic text, is almost totally devoted to issues of the creation of oral histories and the methods of reading, and says little about problems raised by presentation.(2) Michael Frisch's, A Shared Authority, on the other hand, explores in detail methods of reading and presentation, but expressly does not deal, except in passing, with issues of creation.(3) The two when used together do reveal interesting tensions within what seems to be on the surface a seamless historiographic posture. To simplify a complex debate. I think my own concerns are more structural while those of Frisch revolve around issues of agency. In general, I am more concerned with the structural field within which human action in history takes place. In this case I am concerned with the structures of the interview and how, if possible, they reflect the structures of the mind making history. My reading of Frisch's work is that he is more concerned with human agency in the making of history; the ways in which structural boundaries can be transformed and transcended by human activity. I have found the discussion of these tensions to be one of the most useful guides into issues of the historiography of oral history. They also resonate with larger issues of the tension between agency and structure raised in recent historical study in any number of areas.

Questions of creation, interpretation, and presentation are, of course, widely discussed in oral history anthologies and compilations of readings. The two most comprehensive and useful are: Oral History: An Interdisciplinary Anthology, compiled by David K. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Values and Methods in the Classroom Transformation of Oral History
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.