Heidegger, Nazism, and Postmodernism

By Cooke, Bill | Free Inquiry, Fall 1998 | Go to article overview

Heidegger, Nazism, and Postmodernism


Cooke, Bill, Free Inquiry


Bill Cooke

It is one of the features of the depressed state of end-of-millennium philosophy that Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) should be experiencing a tremendous upsurge in popularity. Heidegger, once relegated to a chapter in the literature on existentialism, has recently reemerged as a central intellectual influence on the current fashion of postmodernism.

At the same time, the extent of Heidegger's collaboration with Hitlerism has become even clearer. This has developed to such an extent that David Harvey, a Marxist postmodernist, has admitted Heidegger's Nazi past (and that of Paul De Man, another prominent postmodernist thinker) to be a "major embarrassment" for postmodernism.

FASCIST ROOTS

Heidegger was born into a staunchly Catholic family of modest means in the southwestern corner of Germany in 1889. Acknowledged early on to be brilliant, he was nurtured through the Catholic education system of his region. In his youth he repaid that confidence by advocating a very conservative, authoritarian Catholicism. During the First Word War, Heidegger worked in the censorship office, reading soldiers' mail. It is widely thought he used his position to read the mail of colleagues and rivals for the various academic posts he was applying for at the time.

After the war Heidegger came under the influence of Edmund Husserl (1859-1938), at the time Germany's most influential living philosopher. Husserl recognized Heidegger's genius and lobbied extensively on his behalf to secure an academic position. Within weeks of securing the position at Freiburg that he had coveted, Heidegger stopped visiting Husserl. When Husserl, a Jew, was forbidden to lecture by Nazi legislation, Heidegger didn't lift a finger to help him. He didn't even attend his funeral.

Heidegger joined the Nazi Party in May 1933, only four months after Hitler's rise to power. He was by now Rector of Freiburg University and had enthusiastically launched into a program of reorganizing the university on Nazi principles. This included compulsory military training for students, a militarist code of honor for the staff, and active encouragement of book-burning at the university. Heidegger also abolished all of the university's governing bodies.

Those at the heart of the ideological power centers of National Socialism suspected Heidegger was merely "playing at National Socialism," and they appointed other people to important positions in German curriculum and university administration. After about a year in the job Heidegger resigned as Rector, although he retained his party membership.

After the war the de-Nazification commission banned Heidegger from lecturing until 1949 and holding any official university position. It was decided that his support of the Nazi regime had been significant because his international reputation as a philosopher had given the Nazis respectability that helped cement their control of the country in those early months. Heidegger remained bitter about his treatment, feeling that he had been singled out unfairly. But he never retracted any of the statements he made during his years as an active Nazi. He actually reaffirmed them as late as 1966.

The question that developed was: Is Nazism intrinsic to Heidegger's philosophy? Into this situation stepped two scholars: Julian Young, based in Auckland, New Zealand, and Rudiger Safranski, from Berlin. It was Young's intention in Heidegger, Philosophy, Nazism to undertake a "de-Nazification of Heidegger." Safranski's book, Martin Heidegger: Between Good and Evil, is an attempt at a comprehensive intellectual biography of Heidegger.

Young's job is perhaps the more difficult, as he is running against the current philosophical tide. He admits early on that Heidegger's involvement with Nazism was "much deeper and much less honourable than the official story makes out." Heidegger was, at least for two years "a real Nazi: his involvement was a matter of conviction rather than compromise, opportunism, or cowardice.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Heidegger, Nazism, and Postmodernism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.