Censure Bill Clinton

The Progressive, November 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Censure Bill Clinton


Progressives and Democrats have plenty of reason to be disgusted with Bill Clinton, but we don't believe he should resign or be impeached.

His offenses do not rise to the level of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors." Our founders did not have lying about sex in mind when they wrote Article II, Section 4, of our Constitution, which is entitled: "All civil offices forfeited for certain crimes." It specifies two of those crimes: treason and bribery. Both are of the utmost gravity and relate directly to public, political abuse. Lying under oath about sex or getting others to lie about it does not come close to "Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors."

If Ken Starr had used the discretion most prosecutors in America routinely exercise, this whole scandal would have gone away a long time ago. Very few people in America are prosecuted for lying about sex in a civil suit, especially after the suit is dismissed. And while the perjury charges against Clinton are the most serious part of this case, they may not be that easy to prove.

First, there are David Kendall's questions as to whether Clinton literally lied, though he hardly told the whole truth. Then there's the question as to whether the particular lie was even material to the Paula Jones case.

Ken Starr argues that each and every sexual detail in this report is necessary to show that Clinton lied when he testified that he did not touch Monica Lewinsky's breasts or genitals. The case turns on these most intimate details, and on the lawyers' dispute over whether oral sex and masturbation count as "sexual relations."

You couldn't get much further from matters of public policy.

This case is not about usurping power.

It is not about using the Executive Branch to go after political enemies, as Nixon did when he ordered the IRS to audit Democrats, or when he sent the Plumbers to break into the Brookings Institute, or when he ordered the CIA to tell the FBI to back off on the Watergate investigation.

It is not about disregarding the specific policies Congress enacted, as Reagan did when he violated the Boland Amendments and when he traded arms for hostages.

Nothing in the Starr Report comes anywhere near these kinds of public, political abuses.

Instead, we have a case of public humiliation: a report, distributed everywhere, that provides a detailed account of a series of sexual liaisons between the President and Lewinsky.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Censure Bill Clinton
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?