Buying Votes, Buying Friends: Tobacco Industry Political Influence

By Tannenbaum, David | Multinational Monitor, July-August 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Buying Votes, Buying Friends: Tobacco Industry Political Influence


Tannenbaum, David, Multinational Monitor


A. From Head to Toe: Big Tobacco's Political Stratagems

"Mr. Kornegay, [chair of the Tobacco Institute], stated that he had been privileged to attend the ceremonies at the opening of the new Brown & Williamson plant in Macon, Georgia. He reported that the ceremonies were most impressive, with the Governor, the Mayor of Macon, and several members of Congress in attendance" .

So read the minutes of the sixty-fourth meeting of the Tobacco Institute's Executive Committee. This and other recently released internal tobacco industry documents record for the annals of an ignominious history the influence of the tobacco industry on government decision-makers. The documents show that the impressive representation of local, state and federal officials at the Brown & Williamson plant opening reflect Big Tobacco's pervasive influence at all levels of government.

Big Tobacco has long trembled at the possibility of meaningful government action to combat the companies' efforts to addict generation after generation to the smoking habit. When the occasional high-level government official has turned against the industry, the tobacco companies have marshalled their troops and declared "war."

In response to a modest proposal by Health, Education and Welfare Secretary Joseph Califano to withdraw government research and other support for the industry, a Brown & Williamson executive wrote in an internal note, "This is an all-out effort by [Health, Education, and Welfare Secretary Joseph] Califano, and we should consider trying to fight this stance through contacts with top government officials. ... This is an all-out war between Califano and industry and will be determined by whether Califano is more powerful than industry and Congress or if industry and Congress are more powerful than Califano" .

This tenor is maintained in other documents, as in one written by an attorney from Brown & Williamson which declares, "The Institute must continue to wage war against all legislation which would adversely affect the industry in any way" .

THE COST OF CONGRESSIONAL GOODWILL

The documents show that the tobacco companies were more than able to fund the "war." Since the law requires that most political donations be made public, it has long been known that tobacco companies are one of the biggest donor groups in the country. For example, according to government watchdog group Common Cause, since 1987 the industry has given $11.9 million in direct contributions to candidates and $16.7 million more in "soft money" contributions to national parties. In the 1995-1996 elections, Philip Morris was the number one donor in the country, with more than $4 million in hard and soft money contributions. Industry lobbyists have poured millions more into congressional coffers.

But despite the fact that senators voting against the most recent tobacco bill received an average of more than four times as much tobacco money as those voting for it, donors and recipients alike continue to deny the influence of contributions. For example, in a Philip Morris document of anticipated questions and prepared answers, the company's response to the question "What does the company hope to gain from [soft money donations]," is "PM participates in the political process of this country as all Americans are constitutionally permitted to do. ... PM does so to make known to public policy officials the views of the company, its employees and shareholders" . The industry documents show the companies intended much more than merely to communicate views with their massive contributions - they expected to gain the ability, to influence lawmakers' votes and actions.

For example, a collection of Tobacco Institute documents entitled "Comments Made at the Annual Meeting, December 13, 1984" describe the scope and intent of Tobacco Institute donations targeted at members of tax-writing committees and members of the Ways and Means, and Finance committees.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Buying Votes, Buying Friends: Tobacco Industry Political Influence
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?