Reforming Civil Commitment: Serving Consumers' Needs While Protecting Their Rights

By Bonnie, Richard J. | Developments in Mental Health Law, January 2006 | Go to article overview

Reforming Civil Commitment: Serving Consumers' Needs While Protecting Their Rights


Bonnie, Richard J., Developments in Mental Health Law


Preface

I am pleased to be here and to share the podium with the Chief Justice. For many years I have studied the laws that affect people with mental illness and have many thoughts about what these laws should look like. But I have been asked to be here for a specific reason--to sound the keynote and to set the tone for today's conference on "Reforming the Involuntary Commitment Process" in the Commonwealth of Virginia.

So it is best to begin with the unvarnished truth--the involuntary commitment process in Virginia does need to be reformed. Many of you were among the 300 participants in this process who completed questionnaires recently sent out by the Chief Justice seeking your opinions on the current practice of civil commitment in the Commonwealth. These responses reveal a great deal of dissatisfaction with this practice across a broad range of issues. (3)

What is most striking are the responses to a question that asked what you would do if you could "fix just one thing." Many of you refused to play by the rules, saying that there are so many things that need to be fixed that you could not pick out only one thing. Moreover, the scope of the challenge we face is shown by the fact that you picked many different things. But to sum up your responses in three phrases, you want more beds, higher fees, and fewer handcuffs. Other sources of dissatisfaction are the lack of less restrictive alternatives to hospitalization, the absence of adequate mechanisms to implement mandatory outpatient treatment, the unrealistic nature of current statutory time requirements, and a failure to provide a meaningful opportunity to appeal.

We have an historic opportunity to set in motion the engine of reform for a part of the mental health code long overdue for change. It has been more than twenty years since the last time legislative attention was focused on this topic. I remember it well because I still bear the scars of battle from that failed initiative. Perhaps I ought to say a few words about this history.

Prior Efforts at Reform

The story begins in 1982 when three separate activities converged. The most important development was the appointment of a Joint Subcommittee of the General Assembly to study the commitment process. This legislative initiative was stimulated and chaired by a young Delegate from Arlington, Warren Stambaugh, who observed and participated as counsel in a number of commitment hearings. He felt that the process needed to be fixed.

A second strand was the interest of the State Human Rights Committee (SHRC), which I then chaired. Responding to complaints about civil commitment in Virginia, the SHRC appointed several task forces to look at the commitment process, including an examination of particular concerns associated with the involuntary hospitalization of children, people with substance abuse disorders, and long-term patients in state facilities.

The third thread was research conducted by the Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy (ILPPP). We had conducted a study involving systematic observations of about 200 commitment hearings across several Virginia jurisdictions. The data showed that most hearings took only a few minutes, with very little participation by the person for whom involuntary hospitalization was sought, or even by the attorney appointed to represent the person. There were also distinct variations in attitude and practice among the special justices conducting these hearings, ranging from solicitous concern to apparent indifference.

Following a conference featuring the ILPPP's research findings, the SHRC and the Joint Subcommittee held a joint meeting in Charlottesville in the summer of 1982 and took the first step in what became a two-year process of consensus-building in the drafting and re-drafting of legislation. After several false starts, the proposed legislation passed the Virginia House of Delegates, unanimously as I recall, but eventually failed in the Virginia Senate by one vote in 1984. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Reforming Civil Commitment: Serving Consumers' Needs While Protecting Their Rights
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.