In Federal Court, a Forensic Psychologist Can Disclose Information to a Jury That Constitutes Hearsay If Its Probative Value Substantially Outweighs Its Prejudicial Effect; Fourth Circuit Does Not Address Crawford Issue

By Hafemeister, Thomas L. | Developments in Mental Health Law, January 2007 | Go to article overview

In Federal Court, a Forensic Psychologist Can Disclose Information to a Jury That Constitutes Hearsay If Its Probative Value Substantially Outweighs Its Prejudicial Effect; Fourth Circuit Does Not Address Crawford Issue


Hafemeister, Thomas L., Developments in Mental Health Law


Mental health professionals conducting forensic evaluations generally rely on a wide range of information in reaching their opinions. However, because the sources of that information may not be available for cross-examination, an objection may be raised at trial that recounting this information constitutes inadmissible hearsay (i.e., evidence based not on a witness' personal knowledge, but on another's statement that was not made under oath) and should be excluded under the rules of evidence generally applicable to court proceedings. The Fourth Circuit rejected such an objection in a case where a psychologist provided testimony rebutting a defendant's insanity defense.

The defendant had been charged in federal court with being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm. After he filed a notice of his intent to raise an insanity defense, he was transported to a correctional center for a requested psychiatric examination. Once there, his mental status was evaluated by a clinical psychologist. Having concluded that the defendant did not meet the requirements of the insanity defense, the psychologist was called as a witness by the prosecution to rebut testimony from another expert produced by the defendant that the defendant had been insane at the time of the crime.

The psychologist asserted that the defendant was malingering and testified that two inmates had separately approached another forensic psychologist at the correctional center and told his colleague that the defendant had tried to recruit them to help him appear crazy while he was on the unit. The psychologist acknowledged he had not talked to either of these inmates, and neither his colleague nor the two inmates were called to provide testimony. The defense counsel's objection that this testimony was inadmissible hearsay was unsuccessful, the jury rejected the defendant's insanity defense, and the defendant was sentenced to 230 months of imprisonment.

On appeal, the Fourth Circuit ruled that even if the psychologist's testimony constituted hearsay, it was still admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence, which govern in federal courts. The court noted that Federal Rules of Evidence 703 permits an expert to rely on facts that are not admissible in evidence if they are of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in that particular field in forming opinions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

In Federal Court, a Forensic Psychologist Can Disclose Information to a Jury That Constitutes Hearsay If Its Probative Value Substantially Outweighs Its Prejudicial Effect; Fourth Circuit Does Not Address Crawford Issue
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.