Ethics Issue Halts Military Contract; Favoritism Issue Raised

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), December 16, 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Ethics Issue Halts Military Contract; Favoritism Issue Raised


Byline: Tom LoBianco, THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Work on a high-priority project to integrate the Pentagon and Department of Veterans Affairs health care systems has been delayed by up to two years because of a potentially unethical relationship between a government staffer and a contractor, according to an internal Pentagon report obtained by The Washington Times.

The 16-page report says a staffer in the military health care system gave California-based Adara Networks a potentially unfair advantage in securing a contract to work on the program. That advantage could have led to other multimillion-dollar contracts for Adara.

The Pentagon halted that particular attempt to integrate the systems in September, one month after the review was concluded.

President Obama and Congress have made combining the medical records systems a priority, citing immediate benefits for military veterans and the project's potential to pioneer electronic systems for civilian medical records nationwide.

I can't tell you how many stories that I heard during the course of the last several years, first as a United States senator and then as a candidate, about veterans who were finding it almost impossible to get the benefits that they had earned despite the fact that their disabilities or their needs were evident for all to see, Mr. Obama said in April.

But the mishandling of the project has delayed the military's effort by a minimum of one year up to two year [sic] and could leave the military with nothing to show for the $13 million it has already spent, the internal report says.

In their report, the Pentagon reviewers focused on the relationship between a military health care system manager, Tommy Morris, and Eric Johnson, the chief executive officer of Adara Networks.

The inappropriate and potentially unethical relationship between Mr. Johnson, Mr. Morris and possibly others within [the military health system] gives Adara Networks a potentially unfair advantage that could endanger any future competitive contracting award and subject such award to protests that would most likely be sustained, wrote Michael P. Fischetti, a contracting specialist for the military health care system and the author of the report.

The report was completed in August and was given to The Washington Times this month. The report was also forwarded to Congress, according to lawmakers and a congressional aide. Pentagon spokeswoman Cynthia O. Smith said it is the subject of an ongoing inspector general's investigation.

Mr. Fischetti said in an interview Tuesday that he could not talk about Mr. Morris or the contents of the report because of the inspector general's investigation. He said improvements are already being made to the contracting process and new contracting safeguards have been established.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Ethics Issue Halts Military Contract; Favoritism Issue Raised
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?